Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />The UCRB Endangered Species Recovery Coordinator (USFWS) serves as liaison to <br />assure that the biological, hydrological, and habitat investigations of the U.S. <br />Fish and Wildlife Service will provide the needed information for making <br />effective consultations under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. It is <br />very apparent that coordination of the work by the various investigators into a <br />fully integrated program would reduce duplication of effort, make more efficient <br />use of available resources (i.e. personnel and funds), and produce needed <br />biological information in a more timely manner. In addition, continuity of such <br />work requires dependable funding levels so that the program can be carried out <br />as planned. There is a need for developing a team effort for biological work on <br />the UCRB. Although differences occur in policies and administrative procedures <br />among agencies or organizations, I believe that a cooperative team effort that <br />is composed of biologists from federal or state conservation agencies can be <br />achieved. The work should be divided among the different workers so that they <br />have responsibility for a particular segment of work or a reach of river that <br />can be accomplished within their resources. The field investigators recognize <br />and agree that overall coordination is needed. <br />Therefore, I recommend that the UCRB Endangered Species Recovery Coordinator <br />continue with his assigned responsibility and authority to direct biological <br />efforts in meeting clear, measurable objectives that are approved by the <br />Biological Subcommittee. This Coordinator could screen the needed work, <br />identify the capabilities of active workers, and allocate funds to assur that <br />high quality work is attained with the constraints of time and available <br />resources. This person would also be responsible for summarizing, inter reting, <br />and refining biological results from field investigations as a collectiv UCRB <br />effort. <br />II. SYNTHESIS OF EXISTING BIOLOGICAL DATA <br />The Interim Report: CRFP Database Evaluation by John Hamill dated April 26, <br />1984 provides an accurate description of the data that has been collected, the <br />analyses that have been completed, and the analyses that are needed for <br />establishing relationships between the habitat and fish. <br />The efforts of the CRFP were directed primarily at obtaining information on the <br />biology of the Colorado squawfish. However, useful information has also been <br />collected on the humpback chub in the Colorado River at Black Rocks and <br />Westwater Canyon and on the razorback sucker in the Green River. <br />Sampling this river system is difficult because of logistics (i.e., limi ed <br />access to some reaches of the river), variable streamflows that are haza dous to <br />the investigators, turbidity of the water that obscures vision of the <br />investigators, variable water conditions that make sampling difficult (e g., <br />deep areas and reaches with high water velocities), and selectivity of t e <br />sampling gear. However, enough sampling has now been accomplished that <br />standardization of the sampling gear and protocol is possible. <br />The CRFP and other past and present study efforts provide an adequate knowledge <br />of the present distribution of rare fish in the UCRB. Additional knowledge on <br />distribution and abundance will be gained from other studies that are pl nned <br />3