My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7347
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7347
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:56 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:25:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7347
Author
Wick, E. J. and J. A. Hawkins.
Title
Observations on Use of the Little Snake River in Colorado, by Endangered Colorado Squawfish and Humpback Chub, 1988.
USFW Year
1989.
USFW - Doc Type
Fort Collins, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
state line until it reaches the western tip of Carbon County where it flows <br />southwest into Colorado toward the Yampa River. The confluence of the Little <br />Snake and Yampa rivers is 5 river miles upstream of Yampa Canyon in Dinosaur <br />National Monument. This study was conducted on the lower 35 miles of the <br />Little Snake River in Moffat County, Colorado. Gradient decreases through <br />this section at approximately 6 feet per mile. MCR 26 ford is located 34.7 <br />river miles (RMI 34.7) upstream of the Yampa River confluence. From MCR 26 <br />ford (RMI 34.7), downstream to MCR 10 bridge (RMI 8.7) the river meanders <br />through sandy substrate along interspersed grazing land and irrigated alfalfa <br />fields. Below MCR 10 bridge the river enters a steep, sandstone canyon at RMI <br />8.0. The gradient drops abruptly in this steep walled canyon which is <br />approximately 1 mile long and contains large substrates of boulder, rubble, <br />and cobble. The river then flows another mile through rock outcroppings in a <br />less constricted, canyon-like area with occasional braiding of the channel. <br />Substrate is predominantly cobble and gravel. The river then reverts back to <br />sand substrate at RMI 6.0 as it meanders through irrigated fields and <br />cottonwood bottoms to its confluence with the Yampa River. <br />Radiotelemetry <br />Colorado squawfish were implanted with radiotransmitters for a winter <br />habitat study on the Yampa River. These fish were being monitored in the <br />spring to document timing of migration to the spawning area within Dinosaur <br />National Monument. Radiotracking methods are outlined in detail in Wick and <br />Hawkins (1989). Fish were tracked from either four wheel drive vehicle, <br />canoe, or foot. Tracking occurred in May, June, July, and October. <br />Fish collections <br />Fish were collected on five sampling trips in May, June, July, and <br />October. All fish collections were between Highway 318 bridge (RMI 15.7) and <br />the confluence with the Yampa River. Most sampling was conducted within the <br />canyon area (RMI 8.0-6.0) located 0.7 mile downstream of MCR 10 bridge. Adult <br />fish were collected by 1 inch mesh, 50 or 150 ft trammel net and 3/16 inch <br />mesh, 30 ft seine. The trammel net was either set in a stationary manner in <br />eddy and pool habitat or was used as a block net at the downstream end of <br />pools while fish were herded into it with the seine. Fish were also sampled <br />with angling; using small spoons, artificial flies, or natural earthworm or <br />mealworm bait. Larval fish were collected with 1/16 inch mesh seine or. <br />dipnet. All adult or juvenile fish were identified and released in the field. <br />Fish were field identified if possible, otherwise they were preserved in 10% <br />buffered formalin for lab identification at the Larval Fish Laboratory at <br />Colorado State University. Photos were taken of all endangered species. <br />Discharge measurements <br />Cross sections were established at two locations for measuring <br />discharge. One station was near the U. S. Geological Survey (USGS) gaging <br />station at MCR 10 bridge (RMI 8.7). The other location was below the canyon <br />at RMI 4.5. Depth and velocity were measured every foot across the stream <br />channel with a Marsh-McBirney top-set depth rod and analog velocity meter. <br />Discharge was calculated from the above measurements using the partial <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.