My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7346
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7346
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:56 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:24:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7346
Author
Wick, E. J. and J. A. Hawkins.
Title
Colorado Squawfish Winter Habitat Study, Yampa River, Colorado 1986-1988.
USFW Year
1989.
USFW - Doc Type
Fort Collins, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> periodic ice jamuig and release, act to raise or lower water surface <br /> elevations at the gage. 'T'hese elevation changes caused by ice effect can <br /> <br />' translate into either higher or lower discharges than are actually occurring. <br />Ice-affected flaw readings were adjusted by USGS hydrologists by compering <br /> various data sources. Actual flow measurements were made near gaging stations <br /> at least twice each winter, usually at initial ice formation in Decembex and <br /> again in February. These known discharges were compared with weather data <br /> (air temperature and precipitation) and flaw data collected at other gaging <br /> stations to correct discharge data for the winter period. Adjusted discharge <br /> data for the winter were as accurate as possible given the extremely variable <br /> ice conditions present when it was collected. Accuracy could be improved by <br /> more frequent actual field discharge measurements. However, at the present <br /> time neither the funds nor demand exists for more accurate winter discharge <br />' data. Because the total water discharged in the winter is small compared to <br /> the rest of the year, any flow calculation error during winter is relatively <br /> small. We worked closely with USGS during the second year of the study to <br /> insure that our discharge measurements were made correctly. Our data was <br /> incorporated into the USGS data base in 1988 to aid in correcting final winter <br /> discharge records. If additional winter flow impacts are expected in the <br /> future as a result of dam construction, funding should be made available to <br /> increase field flow measurements during the winter to improve the accuracy of <br /> winter discharge records. For greater accuracy, gaging stations should be <br /> checked at least twice monthly to correct for ice effect. The only way to be <br /> certain of discharge and water surface elevations relationships at a particular <br /> time is to make actual discharge and water surface elevation measurements.. <br /> This relationship will change as the winter progresses and ice thickr ss <br />r <br /> Ecological considerations of winter stream flaw <br />' In planning strategy to determine winter flaws, consideration should be <br />given to all the primary factors that influence the structure and function of <br />the stream ecosystem (Orth 1987). Karr and Dudley (1981) outlined the <br />' following primary factors: (1) energy source (sediment inputs, particulate <br />organic matter, and nutrients); (2) water quality; (3) temperature; (4) <br />physical habitat structure (channel form, substrate distribution, and riparian <br />vegetation); (5) flow regime; and (6) biotic interactions. <br />Obviously, detailed analysis of all these factors could not be undertaken <br />in this study. However, consideration of these factors is helpful in <br />determining which habitats may be important to maintain. Micro-habitat use <br />patterns of squawfish should be examined in light of these factors to <br />determine additional beneficial aspects to the system of a particular habitat <br />type. other logical criteria that could be used to prioritize habitats that <br />1 should be examined for effects of altered flow include: (1) vulnerability to <br />low flows, (2) natural availability in the ecosystem, and (3) stability of <br />habitat. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />59 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.