My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7346
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7346
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:56 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:24:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7346
Author
Wick, E. J. and J. A. Hawkins.
Title
Colorado Squawfish Winter Habitat Study, Yampa River, Colorado 1986-1988.
USFW Year
1989.
USFW - Doc Type
Fort Collins, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />varied only 0.1 foot between December 15 and February 17. In early March, ' <br />effective depth increased 0.3 foot in response to the 340 cfs discharge, then <br />decreased dramatically by March 15, just prior to ice-out. This decrease in <br />effective depth was due to a drop in stage and bed changes resulting from <br />' <br />increased water velocities along shorelines. <br />These stage-discharge relationships demonstrate several interesting <br />effects of different ice conditions throughout the winter period. As initial <br />freeze-up occurs, shoreline ice (Appendix F) forms along the edge of the <br />river. This has the effect of reducing discharge while increasing water <br />surface elevation (because cross sectional area is reduced at controls). For <br />example, the stage height based on the benchmark at RMI 81.1 under ice-free ' <br />conditions was 90.61 feet at a discharge of 236 cfs. Stage height at the same <br />location under ice conditions on February 7, 1988 was 91.77 feet at 229 cfs <br />(over one foot higher). Another set of measurements showing ice effect was a <br />comparison where stage height was identical for two drastically different <br />discharges. The maximmun stage height measured under winter ice conditions was <br />92.14 on March 2, 1988, at a discharge of 340cfs. On April 6, just after ice- <br />out, an average daily discharge of 1450 cfs resulted in the same stage <br />elevation of 92.14 feet. <br />As the winter progressed during the second year of the study, both stage <br />and flaws increased. The increase in discharge thraughout the winter in spite ' <br />of relatively cold temperatures may have been due to heavy snows in the high <br />country and at lower elevations. Once deep snows build, their insulating <br />effect allows some runoff and maintenance of subsurface flaws, thus ' <br />maintaining winter discharge levels. <br />Normally, on larger streams like the Yampa, the ice cover is in <br />floatation (Rantz 1982). There is no great buildup of pressure as a result of <br /> <br />ice cover. As stage increases or ice thickens, the increased upward force of ' <br />the water causes tension cracks in the ice, usually near the banks. The ice <br />floats up to a position of equilibrium, and water fills the tension cracks and <br />freezes, again forming solid ice cover. This same procedure occurs if stage ' <br />drops, the weight of the unsupported ice causes tension cracks along the banks <br />and the ice falls to an equilibrium position with the water. Under extremely <br />cold conditions, heavy surface ice in contact with the stream may resist this <br />state of equilibrium causing flow conditions to more closely resemble a ' <br />closed-conduit. in mid-February, small increases in discharge (197 to 229 cfs) <br />were not sufficient to raise the level of the ice. The cross sectional area <br />remained fixed like a closed-conduit, resulting only in an increase in ' <br />velocity. Men air temperature warms and discharge fluctuates, ice tensions <br />may increase enough to cause a return to the state of equilibrium. This was <br />observed between January 22 and February 3, when stage increased but discharge ' <br />remained the same. <br />Just as the process of ice formation throughout the winter has the effect <br />of increasing stage at a given discharge, the ice-Out process can have the . <br />opposite effect (Appendix F). This was demonstrated in measurements taken , <br />between March 3 and March 15 (Figure 18 a-g). With only a 10 cfs decrease in <br />discharge, stage was reduced by 0.4 feet. This was likely due to loss of <br />shoreline ice at the controls. As air temperatures warm considerably in March ' <br />and flows increase, ice begins to melt along the banks. This results in an <br />increase in water flowing along the river's edge, lass of the damming effect <br />of the sure ice, and reduction of stage at a given flow. <br /> <br />The ice-out period can be a critical time for some fish because their ' <br />52 <br />' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.