Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CONTENTS--Continued <br /> <br />Tables: <br />17-21. <br /> <br />22-26. <br /> <br />of simulated historical monthly streamflows, control <br />34 (Trout Creek at mouth): <br />For historical conditions and with 100 percent of trans- <br />mountain diversions-------------------------------------- <br />18. With 25 percent of agricultural and no transmountain <br />diversions, and with 25 percent of both agricultural and <br />transmountain diversions, and including 100 percent of <br />industrial and municipal diversions for all simulations-- <br />19. With 50 percent of agricultural and no transmountain <br />diversions, and with 50 percent of both agricultural and <br />transmountain diversions, and including 100 percent of <br />industrial and municipal diversions for all simulations-- <br />20. With 75 percent of agricultural and no transmountain <br />diversions, and with 75 percent of both agricultural and <br />transmountain diversions, and including 100 percent of <br />industrial and municipal diversions for all simulations-- <br />21. With 100 percent of agricultural and no transmountain <br />diversions, and with 100 percent of both agricultural and <br />transmountain diversions, and including 100 percent of <br />industrial and municipal diversions for all sImulations-- <br />Summary of simulated historical monthly streamflows, control <br />point 15 (Yampa River at Craig, Colo.): <br />22. For historical conditions and with 100 percent of trans- <br />mountain diversions---------------------------~---------- <br />23. With 25 percent of agricultural and no transmountain <br />diversions, and with 25 percent of both agricultural and <br />transmountain diversions, and including 100 percent of <br />industrial and municipal diversions for all simulations-- <br />24. With 50 percent of agricultural and no transmountain <br />diversions, and with 50 percent of both agricultural and <br />transmountain diversions, and including 100 percent of <br />industrial and municipal diversions for all simulations-- <br />25. With 75 percent of agricultural and no transmountain <br />diversions, and with 75 percent of both agricultural and <br />transmountain diversions, and including 100 percent of <br />industrial and municipal diversions for all simulations-- <br />26. With 100 percent of agricultural and no transmountain <br />diversions, and with 100 percent of both agricultural and <br />transmountain diversions, and including 100 percent of <br />industrial and municipal diversions for all simulations-- <br />Summary of simulated historical monthly streamflows, control <br />point 25 (confluence of Yampa River and Milk Creek): <br />27. For simulated historical conditions and with 100 percent <br />of transmountain diversions------------------------------ <br />28. With 25 percent of agricultural and no transmountain <br />diversions, and with 25 percent of both agricultural and <br />transmountain diversions, and including 100 percent of <br />industrial and municipal diversions for all simulations-- <br /> <br />Summary <br />point <br />17. <br /> <br />27-31. <br /> <br />v <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />31 <br /> <br />32 <br /> <br />33 <br /> <br />34 <br /> <br />35 <br /> <br />36 <br /> <br />37 <br /> <br />38 <br /> <br />39 <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />41 <br /> <br />42 <br />