My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7344
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7344
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:56 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:23:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7344
Author
Veenhuis, J. E. and D. E. Hillier.
Title
Impact of Reservoir-Development Alternatives on Streamflow Quantity in the Yampa River Basin, Colorado and Wyoming.
USFW Year
1982.
USFW - Doc Type
Lakewood, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Model-simulated historical monthly streamflows for control point 28 (Yampa <br />River at Craig, Colo.) are presented in tables 22 through 26. This control point <br />is located downstream from the proposed Craig Reservoir and also downstream from <br />the confluence of the Williams Fork (fig. 1). The simulated results for reservoir- <br />development option 1 represent both limited upstream reservoir development (ta- <br />ble 3) and major downstream diversions from Juniper and Cross Mountain Reservoirs. <br />The option-2 simulations included a larger number of upstream reservoirs (table 3) <br />and consequently further reduced the flow at this site. Monthly streamflow simula- <br />tions for reservoir-development options 3 and 4 included the immediate upstream <br />effects of the Craig Reservoir and tended to even out the monthly flow distribu- <br />tion (tables 22 through 26). The monthly streamflow for reservoir-development op- <br />tion 4 is less than for option 3 because of the absence of the downstream demand <br />from Juniper and Cross Mountain Reservoirs. The simulated historical 50-year mean <br />monthly streamflows for the 100-percent water-use allocation (table 26) could be <br />reduced to zero for at least 4 months each year under options 3 and 4. <br /> <br />Table 22.--Summary of simulated historical. monthl.y streamflows~ <br />control. point 15 (Yampa River at craig~ Colo.)~ <br />for historical conditions and with 100 percent of transmountain diversions <br /> <br />[FLOW VALUES: A=MEAN; B=MEDIAN; and C=80-PERCENT EXCEEDENCE. Underscored values <br />are less than simulated historical conditions without transmountain diversions] <br />FLOW MONTHLY FLOWS, IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND <br />VALUES OCT. NOV. DEC. JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUNE JULY AUG. SEPT <br /> SIMULATED HISTORICAL CONDITIONS <br />A 138 266 273 211 260 531 2179 5052 4904 767 117 126 <br />B 114 269 278 251 260 530 2193 5293 4924 477 89 129 <br />C 72 210 244 98 245 505 1676 4036 3155 124 42 24 <br />SIMULATED HISTORICAL CONDITIONS WITH 100 PERCENT OF TRANSMOUNTAIN DIVERSIONS <br />A 59 161 187 132 182 453 1795 4661 4517 512 21. 58 <br />B 18 179 200 173 181 452 1863 4902 4533 203 0 1 <br />C 0 30 162 22 170 427 1387 3645 2764 0 0 0 <br /> <br />36 <br /> <br />~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.