Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Table l1.--Summary of simul,ated historical, monthl,y streamfl,ows3 <br /> control, point 39 (Yampa River at steamboat Springs3 COZO')3 <br /> with 100 percent of agricuZturaZ and no transmountain diversions3 <br /> and with 100 percent of both agricul,turaZ and transmountain diversions3 and <br />incZuding 100 percent of industrial, and municipal, diversions fora'll, simuZations <br /> [FLOW VALUES: A=MEAN; B=MEDIAN; and C=80-PERCENT EXCEEDENCE. Ul)derscored <br /> values are less than corresponding table 7 historical conditions] <br />OP- FLOW MONTHLY FLOWS, IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND <br />TI ON VALUES OCT. NOV. DEC. JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUNE JULY AUG. SEPT <br /> WITHOUT TRANSMOUNTAIN DIVERSIONS <br /> A 90 90 84 121 136 146 682 1689 1739 370 145 88 <br /> B "S3 69 70 108 98 137 639 1552 1707 306 148 66 <br /> C 45 48 46 49 49 67 423 1265 1133 225 11 45 <br />2 A 54 49 47 83 48 78 469 1542 1670 277 80 46 <br /> B 1i2 40 1fT R 1fT 67 399 T4f4 1643 193 69 28 <br /> C 18 20 22 20 24 li 236 11 31 1034 110 30 I <br />3 A ~ 46 ~ 37 37 107 414 1442 1670 294 86 45 <br /> B 39 TI. 37 35 34 59 371 1371 T6T4 212 74 22 <br /> C 18 .!2 20 20 21 34 218 1033 1105 133 20 2- <br />4 A 39 37 36 33 35 63 370 1175 1565 178 ~ 21 <br /> B "IT 30 35 31 30 53 m ""f083 1530 109 22 15 <br /> C 16 18 17 fl. 18 34 215 654 940 35 13 I <br /> WITH TRANSMOUNTAIN DIVERSIONS <br /> A 7 0 2 n.. 34 85 349 1304 1356 76 59 2- <br /> B 0 0 0 0 I 62 252 Ti82 1312 0 21 0 <br /> C 0 0 0 0 0 2- 124 879 740 0 0 0 <br />2 A 2 2 1 1 li 22 133 1142 1283 48 18 2 <br /> B 0 0 0 0 0 0 ---0 1043 1252 0 0 0 <br /> C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 679 643 0 0 0 <br />3 A 2- 6 1 0 0 10 65 1053 1307 76 37 17 <br /> B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9"49 1275 0 0 () <br /> C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6f8 708 0 0 0 <br />4 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 784 ]174 0 0 0 <br /> B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 691 1139 0 0 0 <br /> C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 263 549 0 0 0 <br /> <br />24 <br />