Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />3. Allocation Df 50 percent of total active reservoir stor- <br />age for agricultural use without any transmountain diversions, and <br />including 100 percent of industrial and municipal diversions. <br />4. Allocation of 50 percent of total active reservoir stor- <br />age for agricultural use with 50 percent of proposed transmountain <br />diversions, and including 100 percent of industrial and municipal <br />diversions. <br />5. Allocation of 75 percent of total active reservoir stor- <br />age for agricultural use without any transmountain diversions, and <br />including 100 percent of industrial and municipal diversions. <br />6. Allocation of 75 percent of total active reservoir stor- <br />age for agricultural use with 75 percent of proposed transmountain <br />diversions, and including 100 percent of industrial and municipal <br />diversions. <br />7. Allocation of 100 percent of total active reservoir stor- <br />age for agricultural use without any transmountain diversions, and <br />including 100 percent of industrial and municipal diversions. <br />8. Allocation of 100 percent of total active reservoir stor- <br />age for agricultural use with 100 percent of proposed transmountain <br />diversions, and including 100 percent of industrial and municipal <br />diversions. <br /> <br />MODEL RESULTS <br /> <br />Results of the model simulations for nine representative control points are <br />presented in this section (table 6). Four of the controls points are at or near <br />streamflow-gaging stations, which permits a comparison with actual conditions in <br />the basin. The model results showing monthly values of mean, median, and 80-per- <br />cent exceedence flows are presented in five tables for each control point. The <br />first table presents the results of historical conditions with and without trans- <br />mountain diversions and, where appl icable, a summary of the streamflow records for <br />water years 1927-76 from the streamflow-gaging station at or near the control <br />point. The remaining four tables present the results of the 25-, 50-, 75-, and <br />100-percent water-use allocations of the agricultural diversions with and without <br />the transmountain diversions. For all tables, monthly streamflow statistics less <br />than the corresponding values for simulated historical conditions are underscored <br />to indicate reductions in flow. <br /> <br />18 <br />