My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7339
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7339
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:56 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:22:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7339
Author
Valdez, R. A.
Title
A Review of the Hatchery Program for Threatened and Endangered Fishes of the Colorado River.
USFW Year
1985.
USFW - Doc Type
Logan, Utah.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />-I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />4-1 <br /> <br />4.0 HATCHERY FACILITIES AND CAPABILITIES <br /> <br />An evaluation of the potential hatchery sites for endangered fishes of <br />the Colorado River was developed by Valentine (1983). That evaluation was <br />based on the need percei ved by the FWS for hatchery-produced fi shes for <br />various studies and for reintroductions to the wild. The estimated needs <br />range from 182,000 fingerlings per year in 1983 to 500,000 fingerlings per <br />year in 1990 to 1992. Most of the needs, up to 1990, are for such studies <br />as fish passageways, suitability of artificial backwaters, bioassays, <br />hybridization, and imprinting and homing. The estimate of 500,000 <br />fingerlings per year is based on needs for continued studies and on <br />anticipated releases to the wild for reintroduction in population <br />supplementation. <br /> <br />Valentine (l983) recommends, in his feasibility study, the desirability <br />of a warm-water hatchery and research facil ity buil t specifically for the <br />purpose of propagating and conserving the endangered Colorado River fishes, <br />as outlined in a Conservation Plan Proposal (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />1983). Approximately 50% of the facility is proposed for reintroduction and <br />research of the Colorado squawfi sh, 25% for humpback chub, and 25% for <br />bony tail. The total estimated cost by FWS (1983) for this facility is <br />$1,721,000 for planning and design from 1983 to 1985; $6,849,000 for <br />construction from 1986 to 1987; and $4,045,000 for operation and maintenance <br />from 1988 to 1996. <br /> <br />The total estimated cost to pl an, desi gn and construct a hatchery <br />facility to meet the projected production needs of the FWS is $8,570,000, <br />plus an additional $333,000 to $588,000 per year for operation and <br />maintenance (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1983). In a more detailed cost <br />assessment, Valentine (1983) estimated construction costs of $3,907,721 for <br />major pond culture facilities; $2,932,103 for major raceway culture <br />facilities; and $l,53l,200 for additional hatchery and field laboratory <br />facilities, for a total estimated construction cost of $8,371,024. This is <br />a hatchery with a capability of producing 500,000 3-inch fish (fingerling) <br />per year. From these two documents, it appears that a warm water hatchery <br />designed to produce sufficient numbers of endangered Colorado River fishes <br />will cost between $8.3 and $8.6 mill ion to build, based on 1983 estimated <br />costs, plus about $333,000 per year to mai ntai n and operate. These cost <br />estimates were not critiqued as part of this review. <br /> <br />The alternative to constructing such a hatchery is to utilize existing <br />hatChery facilities. The following is an assessment of existing facilities <br />and devel opment-potenti al hatchery sites capabl e of produci ng endangered <br />Colorado River fishes. The 11 sites evaluated by Valentine (1983) are <br />summarized in Table 5. <br /> <br />Although there are 11 potential hatcheries or sites, Valentine (1983) <br />presents a strong case for construction of a new hatchery because of <br />problems or inadequacies in existing facilities. A short evaluation of each <br />site is presented to highlight strengths and weaknesses. The location of <br />each site is presented in Figure 2. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.