Laserfiche WebLink
. ~ lz <br />identifying larval fish in the field, representative samples were <br />preserved and returned to Logan for identification. Because of the <br />rigorous field schedule these fish have not yet been identified. <br />Juvenile bluehead and flannelmouth suckers were readily collected in <br />the Yampa and Green Rivers, but no juvenile humpback suckers were <br />collected. <br />Few investigators have collected juvenile humpback suckers even <br />though their keel is developed at two-three inches in length (Minckley, <br />personal communication), and the fish should be readily recognized as <br />humpbacks. <br />Acme and Growth <br />Problems have been encountered that make reliable age estimates <br />f <br />rather difficult. At this point, only adult humpback suckers r-ave <br />been collected. After maturity, growth of suckers~in general (Carlander <br />1969) slows greatly, scale annuli are laid down very close together and <br />in many cases worn off before the following year's annulus is 1-aid <br />down. Because these fish ?rP ~^Arp~ no effort ,.;ill b~ made to sacrifice <br />the fish to obtain other boney parts for ageing. Fish obtained during <br />the fall of 1974 have been tentatively aged at 5 to 7 years. Most likely <br />these fish are older than has been estimated. <br />_ Flannelmouth and bluehead suckers are also being studied for age. <br />and g-°owth information, but less difficulty should be encountered in <br />their case. All size classes have been collected and other boney parts <br />can be obtained for validation of the scale method. <br />