My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7281 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7281 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:55 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:18:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7281
Author
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Title
Recovery Implementation Program for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin, Environmental Assessment, November 1987.
USFW Year
1987.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
189
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CHAPTER III AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT <br />Although the Service and the States of Colorado and Utah have documented <br />Colorado squawfish and humpback chub captures since 1979, the extent to <br />which incidental take contributes to these fishes' endangered status <br />remains subject to debate. To address this question, the Proposed Action <br />recommends that a 2-year to 4-year creel survey be conducted by the States <br />to document the extent of incidental taking and to aid in determining <br />where permanent or seasonal closures or other restrictions may be needed <br />to prevent or reduce incidental mortalities. Among the areas that have <br />been recommended for study, the following deserve immediate attention: , <br />(a) Black Rocks (river miles 135-136) on Colorado River; <br />(b) Westwater (river miles 116-124) on Colorado River; <br />(c) Grays Canyon/Three Fords (river miles 148-157) on Green River; <br />(d) Yampa Canyon (river miles 0-56) on Yampa River; and <br />(e) White River (river miles 0-21, 104-109). <br />These areas are depicted in Figure III-I-1. In addition to these areas <br />specific areas of concern include the Yampa River (near Craig, Colorado); <br />Green River (Browns Park, Ashley Valley, near Green River, Utah); Colorado , <br />River (near Moab, Utah, and Grand Junction, Colorado). <br />J. Electrical Power Generation ' <br />The Electrical Energy Market in the Upper Basin - Present and Future ' <br />The Rocky Mountain Power Pool Area (RMPA) is most analogous to the portion of <br />the Upper Basin affected by the Proposed Action.I/ The RMPA is a region of ' <br />the Western Systems Coordinating Council (WSSC) and consists of the states of <br />Colorado, Wyoming, and parts of Utah, Montana, and South Dakota. Combined <br />public and private sales of electricity in the RMPA were 35,404 gigawatthours ' <br />(GWh) in 1985. Peak summer electrical capacity demand in 1985 was 5,739 <br />megawatts (MW) [NERC 1986]. <br />The Upper Basin is presently experiencing excess capacity. According to data 1 <br />compiled by WSCC, the RMPA will likely be experiencing excess capacity into <br />1995 and beyond. During peak summer months, the available capacity over peak <br />load averaged 36 percent in 1984. This figure is estimated to fall to ' <br />24 percent by 1994 [WSCC 1985]. Assuming 20 percent as the percentage of <br />capacity overload required to provide reliable service and meet regulatory <br />requirements, and extrapolating from the data above, capacity should equal <br />120 percent of demand by 1997. In other words, there should be no excess ' <br />capacity in the RMPA in 1997, other than that required to provide reliable <br />service and meet regulatory requirements. <br />J The Upper Colorado River Basin includes States besides those in the RMPA. <br />However, the other WSCC regions which include Basin States--the Northwest ' <br />Power Area and the Arizona-New Mexico Power Area--represent either distant or <br />anomalous conditions. <br /> <br />III-32
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.