My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7234
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7234
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:55 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:13:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7234
Author
Kurey, W. J.
Title
Organochlorine Contaminants in Fish of the Grand Valley (Grand Junction Area of Colorado).
USFW Year
1985.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
f <br />predators come ir0ih -.(it: it fuzCayc \ui at v ? `- ." --. - . Tn rainFj?+w <br />i? tan .. ma *?i <br />trout. the uptake of DDT complex from food was 2.5r: times that from water. <br />Materials and Methods <br />The objective of this study was to sample a large area of the Grand Valley for <br />organochlorine-pesticides which may have accumulated in fish tissues. Based <br />on previous studies it was expected that toxaphene would be found. <br />Most of the streams draining agricultural areas from east of Grand Junction to <br />Mack, Colorado were sampled, although not all of them produced fish. The <br />sampling sites chosen were low in the drainages usually within a mile of the <br />Colorado River. Fish were collected at 16 sites, all of which were located on <br />streams draining the north side of the valley except for four on the Colorado <br />River and one at Highline Reservoir. <br />Fish collections were made from August 6 through 10, 1984 during the <br />irrigation season. Fish were not numerous in the creeks and drains which flow <br />into the Colorado River-. The species of fish available were the ones <br />collected, and only those over 100 cm long were kept. The numbers of fish, <br />species, and locations are summarized in Table 2. <br />One method of collection was to tape a firecracker (M-80 type) onto a stone <br />and allow one or more to explode in a pool or reach, and to recover stunned or <br />dead fish which drifted to the surface or into a seine positioned downstream. <br />On the Colorado River and in Highline Reservoir, electroshocking from a boat <br />was the method used to collect fish. In previous years, fish were collected <br />by electroshocking from the bank but equipment problems and water quality did <br />not allow its use in this study. All three methods were effective. The <br />Colorado Division of Wildlife provided most of the equipment and personnel for <br />the project. <br />Immediately after collection, the fish were wrapped in aluminum foil, bagged <br />in plastic, identified with tags. and cooled with dry ice. At the end of each <br />day, all fish were transferred to a freezer. <br />Twenty-four fish from Highline Reservoir and the Colorado River were .sent to <br />the Colorado-Department of Health for filet analysis. The rest, 59 fish, were <br />submitted to the Columbia National Fisheries Research Laboratory for whole <br />fish analyis by capillary gas chromatography for organochlorine pesticide <br />residues. Actual sample analysis was done by Hazleton Laboratories America, <br />Inc. of Madison, Wisconsin. Levels of detection were 1.0 ppm for toxaphene, <br />0.1 pom for PCB and 0.01 for other organochlorine contaminants. Sample wet <br />weight, percent lipid, and chlorinated insecticide residue on both a wet and <br />lipid basis were reported. Sample weights were about 25 grams. <br />Quality control consisted of duplicate runs on seven samples; percent recovery <br />determination was performed 3 times; two blanks were run. <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.