Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ur4_anochiorine Contaminants in Fish of the Grand Valley <br />(Grand Junction Area of Colorado) <br />Introduction <br />The Grand Valley is a large agricultural and residential valley in western <br />Colorado through which flows the Colorado River. Irrigation laterals <br />withdraw and return substantial volumes of water in this reach of the <br />Colorado River. <br />There have been numerous catches of the Colorado squawfish (a Federally <br />endangered species) and razorback sucker (a Colorado state endangered <br />species) in the Grand Valley reach of the Colorado River. Most of the fish <br />were captured in gravel pits or irrigation return flows. where they were <br />probably most susceptible to sampling equipment. The•area is significant to <br />endangered species, as indicated by their year-around presence. There has <br />been speculation that domestic, agricultural, and industrial pollution impede <br />extensive natural reproduction and proliferation of these species-in the area <br />(CR%P, 1982, Par t 1) . <br />Reports of Colorado squawfish using washes have.persisted, but such use has <br />never been documented (Grand Valley Report. 1982). Although squawfish have <br />been caught in the vicinity of where washes enter the Colorado River, the <br />attractiveness and importance of washes relative to other habitats is unknown <br />(Chuck McAda. CRFP, personal communication). High total dissolved solids <br />(TDS) levels in irrigation returns and ditches may reach levels that Colorado <br />squawfish would avoid (CRFP, 1962, Part 1). <br />Aauatic sampling for the Grand Valley Salinity Project Wildlife Monitoring <br />Study raised the possibility of pesticide contamination in the Grand Valley. <br />Sampling in 1981 and 1982 detected low fish populations in several streams <br />and a scarcity of aquatic insects during the irrigation season. High pH and . <br />conductivity contribute to the harsh conditions, but were not sufficient to <br />explain the complete absence of aquatic insects in some sampleg during the <br />irrigation season. Water quality measurements do not explain the rebound of <br />invertebrate levels,in almost all samples during the post-irrigation season <br />(November through March). It was hypothesized that pesticides were entering <br />the water system either by direct application or by irrigation runoff during <br />the summer season when pesticides are used. <br />Areas outside the Grand Valley Salinity Project study boundary could also be <br />contributing pesticides. These areas all drain into the Colorado River. The <br />effect of toxavhene and other pollutants carried by these waters to the river <br />ecosystem is unknown. <br />In 1982, composite visceral fat samples from fish taken at several locations <br />within the Grand Valley Salinity Control Project study area were submitted to <br />the Colorado Eoidemiologic Pesticide Studies Center, CSU, for pesticide <br />analysis. Toxaphene, at levels from 0.2 ppm to 61.5 ppm, was the only <br />organochlorine compound identified. Laboratory results indicated traces of <br />other organochlorine compounds, but aualitation and quantitation of these <br />residues was not possible.