My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7210
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7210
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:55 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:12:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7210
Author
McMahon, T. E. and J. W. Terrell.
Title
Habitat Suitability Index Models
USFW Year
1982.
USFW - Doc Type
Channel Catfish.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HSI determination. <br />HSI = (CF x CC x CWQ2.x CR2 x COT)1/7 ~ or <br />If CwQ or CR is <_ 0.4, then the HSI_.equals the lowest of the <br />_. _... <br />following: CwQ, CR, or the above equation. , <br />Sample data sets using lacustrine-HSI model are listed in Table 3. <br />Interoretino Model Outouts <br />The proper interpretation of .the HSI produced by the models is one of <br />comparison. If two water bodies have large differences in HSI's, then the one <br />with. the higher HSI should be able: to support more catfish than the water body <br />with the lower HSI ,_, given that the model assumptions have not been violated. <br />The actual differences in-HSI that indicate-a true difference- in-carrying <br />capacity are unknown and likely to be high: We have aggregated a large number. <br />of variables into a single index-with little or no quantitative information on <br />how the variables interact to effect carrying capacity. The probability that <br />we have made an error in our assumptions on variable interactions is high. <br />However, we believe the model is a reasonable hypothesis of how the selected <br />variables interact to determine carrying capacity. <br />Before using the model, any available statistical models, such as those <br />described under model 3 in the next section, should be examined to determine <br />if they better meet the goals of model application. Statistical models are <br />likely to be more accurate in predicting the value of a dependent variable, <br />such as standing crop, from habitat related variables than the HSI models <br />described above. A statistical model is especially useful when the habitat <br />variables in the data set used to derive the model have values similar to the <br />proposed model application site. The HSI models described above may be most <br />useful when habitat conditions are dissimilar to the statistical model data <br />set or it is important to evaluate changes in variables not included in the <br />statistical model. <br />The sample data sets consist of different variable values (and their <br />corresponding SI score), which although not actual field measurements, are <br />thought to represent realistic conditions that could occur in various channel <br />catfish riverine or lacustrine habitats. We believe the HSI's calculated from <br />the data reflect what carrying capacity trends would be in riverine or lacus- <br />trine habitats with the characteristics listed in the respective data sets. <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.