Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3 <br /> <br />In terms of relative abundance, the humpback chub was <br />the mostcorr@on fish collec~ed during this survey. Four . <br />other species of fish were collected and were, in decreasirig <br />order of abundance, the flannelmouth sucker, speckled dace, <br />carp and channel catfish (Table 1). . <br /> <br />Table 1. Relative abundance and number of fish collected from <br />the Little Colorado River in the vicinity of the confluence, <br />during July, 13-15, 1979. <br /> <br />Ranking <br /> <br />Percent of Collection <br /> <br />Number Collected <br /> <br />1. Humpback Chub <br />2. Flannelmouth Sucker <br />3. Speckled Dace <br />4. Carp <br />5. Channel Catfish <br /> <br />47.4 <br />30.4 <br />11.9 <br />5.9 <br />4.4 <br />100.0 <br /> <br />87 <br />56 <br />22 <br />11 <br />8 <br />184 <br /> <br />Totals <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Behavioral Observations ---- During July, adult humpback <br />chubs were seen to forage actively along the substrate, ledges, <br />and in mid-water areas. Unfortunately, the material they were <br />eating was not determined. At this time fish were observed <br />in schools of 15-20 individuals. Another behavioral trait <br />was also suggested to be occurring during July, namely that <br />of possible size segregation by this species. This was <br />reflected by the size of fish taken which, although varying, <br />appeared to represent distinct size classes. In these coll- <br />ections, several size groups were taken, i.e. fish 100 mm, <br />between 100-200 mm, 200-300 mm, and over 300 mm in total length. <br />This observation, although very preliminary, is interesting, <br />and will be further examined in future studies. <br /> <br />Tag~in~ ---- During this survey, 67 humpback chubs were tagged <br />and released, bringing the number of this species marked within <br />the Grand Canyon region to 216. To date, no recaptures have <br />been obtained. Where these taggEd fish go is currently ~~known, <br />although movement into the mainstream Colorado River is <br />considered the strongest possibility, followed by movement <br />upstream in the Little Colorado River. However, until recap- <br />tures are obtained, these suggestions remain undocumented. <br /> <br />Fctoparasites ---- Achorworm ectoparasites, first. noticed <br />during October 1978, were still present, although in low <br />numbers. In July, they infested 2.3 % of the humpback chubs <br />taken, which contrasts markedly with October, 1978 data, when <br /> <br />, <br />