Laserfiche WebLink
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION <br />Radiotelemetry <br />Six Colorado squawfish collected from upper Lake Powell near Gypsum <br />Canyon were implanted with radio transmitters, between April 6 and May <br />28 (Table 1). One additional fish was implanted with an ultrasonic <br />transmitter on April 6. Contact was lost with three fish, including the <br />ultrasonic unit, as soon as the fish were released. However, the remaining <br />four radio-equipped fish were periodically located over periods of time <br />ranging from 5 days to 6 months after release, Three of these fish were <br />followed downstream into the reservoir in April where contact was lost <br />in deep water (Figure 9). Although one of these fish was never recontacted, <br />the remaining two fish were recontacted in the Gypsum Canyon area in May <br />and June. The fish that was relocated in June was again found in the <br />Gypsum Canyon area at the end of July when radio tracking efforts were <br />terminated in the upper reservoir. <br />The most noteable movement was exhibited by the radiotelemetered <br />fish that remained in the vicinity of Gypsum Canyon until early July. <br />In mid-August this fish was found at RM 140, about 4 miles upstream from <br />Black Rocks; an upstream movement of about 160 miles. In September the <br />same fish was located near Clifton, Colorado, an additional 40 miles <br />upstream. <br />Four Colorado squawfish collected from the Gunnison River (1 fish), <br />Colorado River (1 fish), and the region of the confluence of the two <br />rivers (2 fish), were implanted with radio transmitters. Twelve additional <br />Colorado squawfish collected from flooded gravel pits connected to the <br />Colorado River; eight from Walker Wildlife area (RM 163.6), two from <br />Island Backwater (RM 175.3), and two from Labor Camp (RM 183.2) were <br />implanted with radios. Fish were implanted with radio tags and released <br />between May 14 and June 18 (Table '2). Radio contact was maintained with <br />most fish through August, and with some fish into October. Of the fish <br />collected and tagged within gravel pits, nine were released inside the <br />pits whereas three were released outside the pits in the river proper. <br />Fish were released into the river because they were apparently leaving <br />the pits when captured in trap nets. All fish released within gravel <br />pits subsequently moved into the Colorado River. One of the fish released <br />in Walter Walker Wildlife Area (WWWA) subsequently entered Connected <br />Lakes pit for a short time while the fish was moving upstream. A <br />Gunnison River fish apparently died sometimp after implantation; its <br />movement is not reported herein. <br />No long distance ( >50 miles) movements were observed for Colorado <br />squawfish released in the Grand Junction area. However, total movement <br />equaling about 40 miles was observed for some fish. In general, fish <br />collected from WWWA (Figure 10) moved farther than did fish tagged in <br />upstream areas (Figure 11). Most of the radio-equipped fish remained in <br />the Grand Junction area during the study period; however, one Colorado <br />squawfish released in the Gunnison River and four fish from WWWA moved <br />to the Black Rocks region (RM 136) before contact was lost. Although <br />ri4-