My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7176
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7176
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:55 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:10:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7176
Author
Miller, W. H., L. R. Kaeding and H. M. Tyus.
Title
Windy-Gap Fishes Study First Annual Report.
USFW Year
1983.
USFW - Doc Type
Salt Lake City, Utah.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Backwater and Gravel Pit Investigations <br />Earlier CRFP investigations suggested that river backwaters -- <br />naturally indented areas with little or no water current -- are a <br />particularly important habitat for young Colorado squawfish and humpback <br />chub, and that the limited availability of such habitat could limit the <br />survival of these young endangered fishes. If the relative scarcity of <br />river backwaters is limiting, then an increase in backwater availability <br />might appreciably increase the rate of survival for young endangered <br />fishes. <br />Gravel pits are defined in this study as man-made habitats constructed <br />within the river floodplain. They communicate with the river during <br />periods of high river flow but may or may not communicate when river <br />discharge is low. Gravel pits can be hydraulically similar to some <br />natural backwaters. As gravel pits are common in the Colorado River <br />floodplain of the Grand Valley and since such pits will continue to be <br />developed in the future, it seems prudent to investigate the usefulness <br />of these gravel pits as habitat for the spawning and rearing of endangered <br />fishes. <br />During 1982 routine physicochemical and biological surveys were <br />completed on several river backwaters and gravel pits along the Colorado <br />River in the Grand Valley (Figure 2). These investigations were performed <br />to determine the characteristics of habitats used by endangered fishes. <br />Four river backwaters and seven gravel pits were examined on an approximate <br />weekly schedule. Physicochemical analyses included dissolved oxygen <br />(DO), salinity, conductivity, turbidity, and observations on water <br />elevation (stage) and communication between the study area and the <br />Colorado River. <br />Biological sampling of gravel pits was performed using trammel nets <br />and seines during daylight (3x5 mm-mesh), electrofishing during darkness, <br />and qualitatively sampling for larval fishes with a fine-mesh hand net. <br />The biological sampling program for river backwaters differed <br />somewhat from that for gravel pits. Because river backwaters that <br />contain young Colorado squawfish normally contain too few squawfish to <br />allow extensive study of the interactions of fishes and their environment, <br />the natural squawfish populations in study backwaters were supplemented <br />using Colorado squawfish raised at Dexter (New Mexico) National Fish <br />Hatchery. These hatchery fish were about 3 months old and 35-85 mm long <br />when stocked into the experimental backwaters on 6 October 1982. Each <br />fish was marked with a coded-wire microtag before stocking. The microtags <br />consisted of a small ( 1x0.5 mm) piece of magnetized wire that was <br />mechanically inserted in the cartilage of the fish's head. An electronic <br />device detected the presence of a tag when the fish was passed through <br />the detector. The fish need not be killed in order to detect the presence <br />of a tag. Some of these tagged hatchery Colorado squawfish were also <br />planted in gravel pits. <br />-5-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.