My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Deposition of Edward Kowalski: Golden and Eagle County RICD's, S-18
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
Deposition of Edward Kowalski: Golden and Eagle County RICD's, S-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:42:04 PM
Creation date
8/10/2009 2:50:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8230.21A
Description
CWCB Hearing
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
6
Author
Diane K. Scholl
Title
Deposition of Edward Kowalski: Golden and Eagle County RICD's, S-18
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
pplication fo r Water Rights of the Eagle River Water & Sanitation <br />(arch 12, 2002 <br />Ted Kowalski <br />Page 112 : <br />1 Q. (BY MR. PCR2AK) And you have no <br />2 ktivwiedge as to ttse dmuuti't uf water that <br />3 provides a reasonable recreatianal experience <br />4 with rESpect to either of the Vail or -- <br />5 A. Breckenridge. <br />6 Q. -- Breckenridge courses; is that <br />'7 correct? <br />8 A. I have some knowledge, but no expert <br />9 testimony that I'll be giving in that regard, <br />10 that's correct, <br />11 Q o T^Iould you agree that every <br />12 recreational boating right is unique? <br />13 MRo CYRAN: Objection, foundation. <br />19 A. I believe every one that I've seen <br />1`) so far is unique, yes. <br />46 Q. (BY MR. PORZAK) Would you agree <br />1i that there's no standard quantification as to <br />the amount of water that may be reasonable with <br />? respect to a given boating course? <br />MR< CYRAN: Objection, foundatione <br />? <br />1 A. I think there could be some <br />standard, but it wouldn't be a specific number <br />7 that applies across the board. It would be a <br />4 standard methodology to come at that numbero <br />`Q. (BY MR. PORZAK) And would you agree <br />; <br />r i)eposition Services <br />(303) 316-0330
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.