Laserfiche WebLink
: <br />? 25 <br />lU <br />THE COURT:. Any objection,. coun.sel? <br />. ` MR-.. CYRAN : ? No obj ection, - ? <br />? THE.COURT: Same is received. EXHIBITS:. . <br />(Whe.reupon Applicant's Exhibit G 64 was_received <br />intn : eviden.ce. ) : . ? . <br />MR..PORZAK: Tharik you, Your Honor. And we <br />would seek to qualify Dr. Danielson as.an expert to : <br />give opinion testimony in the field of water rights - <br />admi.nistration.to include decree interpretation., water.'' <br />re.source engineering, an.d. civil engineering, to. in.clucle?. water control:and diversiori facilities, and opinion on.. <br />Colorado's compact' -- compacts: <br />THE COURT: Is Golden's a.ppropriation <br />subject.to the compact questio.n there? <br />MR. PORZAK: One of the arguments that has <br />been.raised as we will,get into in Dr...Danie].son's line <br />of.quest.ioning.is that recreational di.versions.should . <br />n_otbe allowed as a matter of policy in law because it. <br />could adversely iinpact Colorado's compact entitlement,. <br />so. . THE COURT: Is it Mr. Cyran.? I'm sorry: <br />MR. CYRAN: Mr..Cyran. <br />THE COURT: Cou].d you spel.l that name for <br />me? .