Laserfiche WebLink
102 <br /> 1 <br />2 under one of the bridges, very near the structure that was there prior <br />to construction .of the course.. <br /> 3 Q Prior to the.course construction, was Gore Creek in.the <br /> 4 reach of.the Vail Park, a natural environment? <br /> 5 A. Not in my opinion. <br /> 6 Q Is the claimed.water right for the Vail Park an in.stream <br /> 7 flow? <br /> 8 A Not at all. <br /> 9 Q And why not? . _: <br /> 10 A An in stream flow based upon.the statute,.:is.that amount of <br /> il water necessary to preserve the natural environment to a reasonable. <br /> 12 degree. An in stream flow is decreec3 to a reach of stream. The Vai1 <br /> 13 bcat courses are oecreed to three discreet structures.. <br /> 14 Q Can you compare the Vail Course with the Goldem,.Fort <br /> 15 Coilins and Littletori Courses, with respect to the extent of <br /> 16 construction and;the control and diversion of water?.. <br /> 17 A Well, I think in the area of control and diversion,. they're <br /> 18 ail very similar. Each course does, in fact, divert and control the <br /> 19 water in the stream itself.. As far as extent of construction, Golden <br /> 20. and Breckenridae are more extensive. Vail is certairily more extensiv e <br /> 21 than the Fort Collins case: <br /> 22 Q Did the Fort Collins aecree only adjudicate the diversion <br /> 23 d am? . <br /> ?4 A No. <br /> 25 Q What other structures were adjudicated? <br />' <br />•