Laserfiche WebLink
. . . . . . 92 <br /> <br />1 . . . . . . . , <br />Q Are you familiar with water rights on'the Bl.ue and Colorado' <br />? <br />2 <br />Rivexs. downstream of the Breckenrid9e Whitewater Park? .... <br /> 3 ? A. Yes, generally. <br />. 4 Q Wi11 a water right for and the operation of the <br /> 5 Breckenridge Whitewater Park : impact any Colorado compact entitlement 3 <br />: 6 A No. ' ? , . . <br /> . <br />7. . <br />Q Why not? <br />. 8 A Simply because there are so many senior users.downstream of <br />- - 9 the Breckenridge Whitewater.Park. Between Breckenridge and.the state <br /> lU line,. the water would be used, in my opiniori, probably ten times over, . <br /> at least residuals, after consumption.` There would be no compaet '?. <br /> 12 implications at all.:_ - I <br /> 13 Q. You. said it'would be used and reused: some ten tiiiies over. <br />? 14 Have you.done anactual estimate in that. regard?_ . . <br /> 15 A Just an estimate. I.haven't made a calculation, but if you.: i <br />I <br /> 16 . <br />look at .the exhibit illustrating the major water rights downstream, <br /> 17 D'illon, Green Mountain, Shoshone and then the calls at Cameo; there's. <br /> 18 no question in my mind tliat water wouTd be corisumed. ? Also the .. . : <br /> 19 Colorado River Compact, the Upper Coloracio River Compact based.on . <br /> 20. beneficial consumptive use and this water is not consumed and.:..:. <br /> 21 therefore.wouid not impact our allocation. : <br /> 22 . Q Are you familiar with the so-called Fruita concern?, . <br /> 23 A Yes, I am. <br /> 24 Q What is that, concern?. <br /> 25. A As I understand.it, it was a concern, at least reiterated <br />? 26 <br />.. if not origi:nally enuiiciated by the opposi.tion in . this .case, : concerns <br />. .. : ; ,