My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Golden, Breckenridge, Eagle Ridge RICD Excerpts, S-16
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
Golden, Breckenridge, Eagle Ridge RICD Excerpts, S-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:42:03 PM
Creation date
8/10/2009 2:09:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8230.21A
Description
CWCB Hearing
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
6
Author
Susan M. Antonelli, Richard J. Matt
Title
Golden, Breckenridge, Eagle Ridge RICD Excerpts, S-16
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
87 <br /> 1 Q Are you familiar with decrees., which list recreation as a <br /> <br /> 2 : . 'beneficial use? <br /> 3 .A. Ye s ; I am. .. ' <br /> .4 - Q Both direct flow and storage. . .. <br /> . 5 A Yes. : . . <br /> 6 Q Are you familiar with the, coricept of a duty of water? <br /> ,.. A Yes, I am. , -? <br />. . $. Q Is there -- based on..your experience,.what is the . <br /> 9 _appli.cati_on , of the concept of , duty of water? <br /> 10 _ . •. A The concept is, as I understand i.t,..a.duty of wa.ter grew <br /> out._of- the early part of statehood where Court's were attempti,ng to. .:. ....-. <br /> 12: quantify irrigation right_s, primarily; and the sciences of . <br /> 13 . evapotranspiration calculations, things of th.at nature, irrigation and. <br /> 14 fishing really were not we31-known. So the Courts attempted to set <br /> 15 what was.called a' duty of water; generally that was one c.f.-s. per 50 <br /> 16 acres of irrigated land or one c.f.s. per 40. :-2t.varied acros.s the <br /> 17. state and varied within each jurisdiction. The attempt, in my <br /> 18 opinion, was to arrive at what's now defined in our statement of <br /> 19 . beneficial use, or the definition of beneficial use,:that the water. <br /> 20 had.to be applied in a reasonably efficient manrier and thatts where <br /> 21. the.concept of duty.of water came from. <br /> 22 Q Is there any duty of watex associated with recreation use, . <br /> 23 outside tlie context of the statutory definition:of beneficial use? <br /> 24 A Not that.I'm aware of. <br /> 25 Q Do you have any opinion as to whether the Breckenridge . <br /> 26 Course.structures are eff'icie.nt means of diversion? .
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.