Laserfiche WebLink
<br />25 <br />intend to- raise any compact issue, we will. spare. th.e' Court the so=called .F:ruita' concern..:'. : ` . . ? <br />THE COURT:Thank you. . . .; <br />Q ?(gy Mr. Porzak) Dr. Danielson;.is the._': ' <br />. ? <br />claimed water right consistent with the.max.imum. , <br />utilization of the state'.s water resources?..?::- ?? ... `. . . <br />A In my opinion,.it is. .. .. <br />4 . WhY? : . . <br />MR. CYRAN: .Your Honor, may?T object? Excuse me.. ` ..'I should ha.ve al.lowed Dr.: Danielson to . ? . " . <br />finish' his response. <br />A. I think there are several reasons that it <br />meet_s the concept of maximum utilization. First o'f. <br />all, it- creates:a new 2000 or 1999, whateve.r the : <br />appl.icat'ion date is; a new water right on a.very? heavily appropriated stream fo.r a new beneficial use; <br />arid...that:'s recreation.`. It is a noncorisumptive use, so.. : <br />the water,that's utilized.for that.:berieficial *use;.is . . <br />available for additional beneficial uses. The water :tHa.t flow.s.through the course is utilized by.other :?. <br />water rights downstream,?. It certain.ly does,hot. -- there is no waste involve, so that achieves that issue ? <br />of maximum beneficial use, and I think the factthat . <br />the City ha.s.worked with water users on the stream both <br />upstream and downstrear?i:and.rea.ched agreement where .