Laserfiche WebLink
- <br />; . <br />. • . L t3 . <br />. . . : <br /> 1 <br />is.sue,... <br />is the coricern about the interstate coinpact <br /> . <br />2 whether or not?. there could• be the p.otential for .. . . <br /> 3 ' Coloracio. ,.to lose the,right to develop her. interstate ... . <br /> q' compact allocations through an injudicious*,locat.ion of <br />, <br /> 5 er, course on some interstate s'tream. <br />a whitewat <br /> . . . .. <br />question of maximum 'utilizatI:on . <br />Alsothe . <br /> 6 . <br /> 7 raised as to. wYiether or riot you believe this is the <br /> ` g: best and highest use of, waters of the state in terms _of: <br />. <br /> 9 : . <br />looking.at future needs for storage, exchange;.. <br /> <br />10. . . , _ <br />whatever. , . <br /> 4 Do they also raise concerns over the <br />. 12 existing state of the law iri Colorado.withrespect to <br />? 13 these types of water rights? <br />? 14 A Yes.:.. There is a statement there' that the . <br /> 15 Fnrt Collins decision was so extremely broad that i't <br /> 1-6 has -- it . needs. to be narrowed. in terms of the. ability' ? <br /> 17 for. _the Water Coriservation Board to dee`ide. and ? <br /> 18 initially rule on cas.es such as.this.' ? <br /> 19- And is th.at what the effect of the _ 4 . . . .. <br />, 20 Iegislation would be? . ; <br /> 21 A Yes. : <br /> 22 Q And be more specific in termsof what it' <br />. <br /> <br />23 <br />. <br />. <br />proposes to accomplish. <br /> 24. " A Well, as I recall, it proposes .that before. a <br /> ' 25 city such a.s Golden could apply to the Water Co:urt for_ ... <br />? . . : _. <br />