Laserfiche WebLink
<br />25 <br />?. <br />of the South. Platte a.t Denver is. So I think" :it's, safe to s:ay , that 'ariy water enterin-g tlie South. Platte will- be:-.* <br />used anywhere 'from four ?to seven times before .what's <br />left exits the. state: ? . ? <br />Q•,•,?Is the Colorado Water .Conserv'ati;on' Board .. <br />currently a propbrient of legislati'on tochange the' law <br />on recreational.in-channel diversions? -: <br />A. My understand.ing is that they are: . ; Q How do you know that they ar.e? :: . A 'I'm a member: of the Colorado Water Congress.: ? <br />. <br />,; . <br />I ; .. . <br />receive. their mailings: - -I be.lieve. in the. last <br />mailing included what T would call a white,?paper. .: <br />MR. - CYRAN: Objectio?n, : Your Hono_r. Hear.say; <br />and relevance.. . : <br />THE:.COURT: On the latter ground 1..'11:-= ? <br />what's"th?.relevance of the Board's attempt.:to have? <br />certai:n legislation passed, Mr..Porzak?: ?. <br />. . MR: PORZAK: Two areas of rel?evance.- Number.?.one,. it's a direct admissiori against i:nterest., We hear: , <br />a-t the outset, Mr: Sims made the statem,e'nt that the.`: . <br />'Fort Collins case was a'very narrow except`io'n to the ? ?. <br />law in Colorado, and both in the pr'oposed l.egisl.ati:on .? and in. the:white paper that Dr. Danielson just testified to. that.there are substantial admissions : <br />against interest,. that nothing could.be further from .? .