Laserfiche WebLink
22 JOSEPH B. HUNN AND ROSALIE A. SCHNICK <br />• Significant differences exist in the chemical com- <br />position of water between the site of the kill and <br />the reference (control) site <br />• On-site toxicity tests indicate that water from the <br />kill site is toxic, whereas that from the reference <br />site is not <br />Sediment <br />• A suspect toxicant is present in sediments from <br />the site of the kill <br />• The suspect toxicant was not found in sediments <br />from the reference site or is present in equal or <br />lesser quantities at the reference site <br />• Toxic chemical levels at the site of the kill are <br />higher than those of background samples from the <br />area (Kelly and Hite 1984) <br />Tissues <br />• Activity of enzymes (e.g., acetylcholinesterase in <br />brain, ATPase in gills) is reduced in fish from the <br />kill area <br />Concentrations of toxic metals (e.g., Cd, Cu, Hg, <br />Zn) in gill tissue are higher in fish from the kill <br />area than in fish from the reference site (sus- <br />pected metal poisoning) <br />Concentrations of the suspect toxicant in tissues <br />are greater in fish from the kill site than in those <br />from the reference site <br />Concentrations of the suspect toxicant in fish <br />tissues are known to be toxic <br />Investigations of kills suspected to have originated <br />from a toxic substance must proceed as though the <br />cause is unknown. All factors must be checked or <br />eliminated unless there is firm evidence that certain <br />causes are not involved. The investigation should <br />proceed through a process of elimination. <br />The use of autoanalyzers provides rapid <br />and highly sensitive water chemistry deter- <br />minations. <br />