Laserfiche WebLink
relocated in the lower 20 mi (32 km) of Yampa Canyon (Table 18). By <br />late July, all the radiotagged fish had left the lower Yampa Canyon and <br />when relocated, were generally found at the same area of initial capture. <br />Found in association with these fish was one Colorado squawfish radiotagged <br />in the lower Green River, RM 248 (km 397), near Ouray, Utah, which also <br />returned to its initial location in late July. Fish No. 273 (Table 18) <br />implanted at Echo Park in the Green River, moved upstream in early July. <br />This fish was lost in Ladore Canyon on 11 July. Although an attempt was <br />made to capture other Colorado squawfish in Ladore Canyon in early July, <br />none were captured. <br />Radiotelemetry of Colorado squawfish in the Green River in 1980 suggested <br />that such long distance movement at that time of year was associated <br />with spawning (Tyus et al. 1981). Although objectives of the Yampa <br />study did not permit disturbance of the radiotagged squawfish, extensive <br />collecting with floating trammel nets was conducted near them. Collections <br />made from 1 July to 9 July, 1981 produced 34 Colorado squawfish in <br />spawning condition. These fish were either ripe males or spent females <br />and catch reflected a very high catch per effort of ripe Colorado squawfish <br />from short pool-riffle-pool habitat sections in the lower Yampa Canyon. <br />Eight radiotagged Colorado squawfish migrated to the lower Yampa <br />River during June and July (Figure 13). Distances traveled during <br />spawning migration were calculated for those fish that returned to the <br />initial point of capture and remained at that location. One of these <br />fish (No. 1) moved past the initial capture point and relocated 54 mi <br />(93 km) upstream. Contact with the Fish No. 2 was lost on the spawning <br />grounds. however, since the fish was tagged in October 1979 at RM 55 (km <br />88) by Colorado DOW and recaptured two years later at this same location, <br />the assumption is made that this fish returned there (with an inoperable <br />radio tag). The remaining six fish (No's 3-8, Figure 13) exhibited a <br />spawning migration that accounted for 96% of the total movement during <br />the study period. <br />Data from conventional tag recaptures substantiate the movement <br />exhibited by the radiotelemetered fish. Four Colorado squawfish were <br />recaptured on the spawning grounds. Two of these (Table 19) were <br />tagged on the upper Yampa in August 1978 and 1980, and the other was <br />tagged in the upper Green in May 1981. <br />A total of 64 adult Colroado squawfish were tagged with Carlin <br />dangler tags in the Yampa River and 15 were tagged in the Green River <br />(in DNM) during 1981. Seven of these fish were recaptured. In addition, <br />five adults, initially tagged by other investigators from 1978 to 1980, <br />were also recaptured. Only one fish (No. 0219) was recaptured in the <br />Green River (DNM); however, 11 were recaptured in the Yampa River (Table <br />20). No population estimates can be calculated from the tag/recapture <br />data because of the small numbers of fish captured and the bias R <br />inherent in tag/recapture calculations for a migrating species. <br />56