My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7125 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7125 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:07:39 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 12:37:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7125
Author
McAda, C. W.
Title
Aspects of the Life History of Three Catostomids Native to the Upper Colorado River Basin.
USFW Year
1977.
USFW - Doc Type
Utah State University,
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
11 <br />razorback suckers were frozen and returned to Utah State University <br />for enzyme analysis. Flannelmouth and biuehead suckers were dissected <br />to determine sex and maturity. Razorback suckers were sexed before <br />release using external characteristics described by Gustafson [1975] <br />and other characteristics determined from examination of specimens <br />collected and preserved by previous investigators [Vanicek, 1967; <br />HoZden, 19731. For example, the last ray of the anal fin is curved <br />for mature male razorback suckers while it is straight for mature <br />females. The fish were weighed, measured and scales were removed from <br />a key area located midway between the origin of the dorsal fin and the <br />lateral line. Live razorback suckers and Colorado squawfish were <br />tagged with numbered Floy anchor tags and released near the point of <br />capture. <br />Movement <br />Selected male razorback suckers were tracked using ultrasonic <br />transmitters inserted into the body cavity. These transmitters were <br />cylinders (64 mm long, 16 mm in diameter, weighing 19.3 g) and were <br />operated at 157.5 to 180.5 kz. Each transmitter operated on a separate <br />frequency to aid in identification of individual fish. Tracking <br />equipment consisted of a battery powered multifrequency receiver <br />with headphones and a directional hydrophone. Fish movements were <br />monitored from shore or from a small boat. Effective range was <br />shorter than reported by other investigators [Hasler, et at., 1969; <br />Stasko, HorraZ, and Hasler, 1976; Ziebe ZZ, 1973] and varied from <br />150 m in quiet water to 10 m in turbulent or rapid water. Fish <br />locations were determined by triangulation or by estimating the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.