Laserfiche WebLink
and its confluence with the Colorado River. <br />Gill nets, trammel nets, seines and electrofish- <br />ing were used. No bonytail or humpback chubs <br />were collected and razorback suckers were <br />collected only at the Palisade Labor Camp and <br />the Walker Wildlife area. Colorado squawfish <br />were taken only at the'Walker area. A total of <br />19 razorback suckers and 2 Colorado squawfish <br />were collected in the Colorado River and one <br />razorback sucker was collected in the Gunnison <br />River with 105 man-days of effort. No young of <br />either species were reported. <br />202. Kirsch, P. H. 1888. <br />fishes obtained <br />Thomas, Arizona, <br />Carpenter, U. S. <br />National Museum <br />Notes on a collection of ENDANG. FISH <br />in the Gila River at Fort DESCRIPTION <br />by Lieutenant W. L. COLORADO R. <br />Army. Proceedings U. S. 3, 8, 14, 15, <br />11:555-558. 21 <br />Notes on or descriptions of fishes, are provided <br />for Catostomus latipinnis, C. gila, C. insignis, <br />C. clarki, Xyrauchen cypha, Ptychocheilus <br />lucius, and Gila emorri (outside area of <br />consideration). <br />203. Klein, W. D. 1957. A partial census of the <br />whitefish and trout population in the <br />Yampa and White rivers and their tribu- <br />taries. Colorado Division of Wildlife, <br />Fort Collins. Special Purpose Report 47. <br />18 pp. (Abstr.) <br />During the summer of 1955 fish populations in <br />the Yampa and White river drainages were partially <br />censused by means of an electrical shocking <br />device. The information thus obtained was <br />combined with available creel census data <br />analyzed with particular emphasis on the white- <br />fish populations. The whitefish were found to <br />be widely dispersed and numerous in both drainages. <br />The average size of the whitefish is appreciably <br />larger in the White River drainage as compared <br />to the Yampa. In both drainages the presence <br />of substantial numbers of whitefish of spawning <br />size was indicated. The creel census data <br />shows little change in the average size of the <br />whitefish catch over a period of years thus <br />suggesting stability in the population. There <br />is a naturally produced and sustained "healthy" <br />SURVEY <br />CREEL CENSUS <br />DISTRIBUTION <br />YAMPA R. <br />WHITE R. <br />30, 36 <br />85 <br />