My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7086
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7086
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:06:54 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 12:35:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7086
Author
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Title
Indexed, Annotated Bibliography of the Endangered and Threatened Fishes of the Upper Colorado River System.
USFW Year
1977.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, Co.
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
173
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
from which 20,000 to 26,000 pounds of trout <br />averaging 1.0 to 1.5 pounds have been harvested <br />each year since 1970. The river is large: <br />over 300 feet wide, average depth of 2.0 feet. <br />Flows range from 300 cfs to 15,000 cfs over a <br />gradient of 4.8 feet per mile. <br />Prior to construction of Fontenelle <br />Reservoir the river supported fish of little <br />sport fishery value--carp, suckers, and catfish. <br />Alteration of water temperature, water clarity, <br />and flows through impoundment created a river <br />environment capable of supporting salmonid <br />fisheries. The fisheries has developed with an <br />average daily flow of 1600 cfs. The fishery <br />resource of the Fontenelle tailwater is competi- <br />tion with industry, agriculture, and municipal <br />interests for the river water. During the <br />summer and fall of 1973 a series of in-stream <br />measurements were taken at four representative <br />stations of flows of 16 cfs, 800 cfs (50% ADF), <br />500 cfs (30% ADF), and 300 cfs (18% ADF). The <br />study was conducted to evaluate the impact of <br />reduced flows on fish and wildlife and to <br />formulate an optimum flow regime. <br />Parameters measured at the established <br />stations were depth, velocity, cross sectional <br />areas, and wetted perimeter. Additionally, <br />aerial photographs were taken over the entire <br />73 miles of stream at the four discharges. In <br />order of magnitude those parameters affected by <br />flow reduction were volume, velocity, cross- <br />sectional area, depth, width, and total wetted <br />surface area. <br />Total surface area at each flow release <br />was broken down into 64 categories comprised of <br />depth (feet) and velocity (feet per second) <br />intervals from 0.5 to 3.5. Specific depth- <br />velocity ranges were assigned to potential food <br />production habitat, shelter microhabitat and <br />habitat in which particular size trout can be <br />sustained. Total surface area of water available <br />at each flow to provide these specific habitat <br />requirements was determined. Of the four flows <br />studied in 1973, the flow of 800 cfs appeared <br />to provide the most balanced habitat diversity <br />in meeting most production and survival needs <br />for all sizes of trout. <br />To perpetuate the existing fisheries <br />resource a winter (November through March) <br />survival flow of 500 cfs was recommended and, <br />if necessary, an emergency short-term (30 days) <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.