My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7073
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7073
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:55 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 12:33:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7073
Author
Brewer, M. and J. Renne.
Title
Application of the Instream Temperature Model to the Green River Basin
USFW Year
1989.
USFW - Doc Type
Draft.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
~ L_ <br />Instream Tesperature Model " '•DRAFT..R. <br />Page 3 <br />March 27, 1989 <br />validation nodes and are usually U. S. Geological Service gaging <br />stations where water temperatures are measured. <br />R_e g r_e s_s__o n .,_M o d_e 1 <br />The regression model is used to fill in missing water temperatures <br />at headwater and validation nodes. Two regression model options are <br />available in the temperature model. The standard regression model <br />is a simple linear multiple regression model that predicts water <br />temperature as a function of air temperature, wind speed, relative <br />humidity, sunshine ratios, solar radiation, and discharge. The <br />transformed regression model is a physical-process model where <br />meterologic data are used to determine the equilibrium temperature <br />and the first-order thermal exchange coefficient. These parameters <br />are matched with corresponding discharges as independent variables <br />to determine the regression coefficients for estimating water <br />temperature. <br />The regression model does not fill in missing discharges at nodes <br />within the network. If some flow data are missing, the model fills <br />in these missing points with the average flow for the time period in <br />question. <br />LITERATURE REVIEMI <br />The model programs were originally written for execution on a Cyber <br />mainframe computer. The Aquatic Systems Group, Fort Collins, <br />Colorado, recently modified these programs for execution on IBM-AT <br />compatible microcomputers (Bartholow, 1987). <br />The model predicts mean daily (24-hour average), minimum night-time, <br />and maximum daily water temperatures. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife <br />Service previously used the temperature model to predict tempera- <br />tures within the Upper Colorado River Basin, including the mainstem <br />Colorado and Green Rivers, the Yampa River, and associated tributar- <br />ies, The final model network included 78 nodes; a monthly time <br />period was used. The absolute difference between observed and <br />predicted average daily temperatures was 1.32°C for the entire <br />network on an annual basis (Brewer, 1985). Theurer and Voos (1982) <br />verified the model solution techniques and validated the temperature <br />model using a network analogous to the one used by the Service <br />(1984). Theurer et al. (1982) also used this network and calibrated <br />the model to observed temperatures in the Upper Colorado River <br />Basin. <br />O'Brien and Miller (1984) used the temperature model to simulate <br />weekly river temperatures throughout the Yampa River. The average <br />mean error for all time periods after calibration was 0.14°C. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.