Laserfiche WebLink
.. ~ <br />Instream Temperature Model " "DRAFT " " <br />Page 5 <br />March 27, 1989 <br />Assistant State Climatologist, Colorado State University. He <br />requested the data from the U.S. Department of Commerce, National <br />Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Ashville, North Carolina. <br />All microclimate data were recorded from the Grand Junction, <br />Colorado meteorologic station. Stream geometry data were obtained <br />from field observations and USGS topographic maps. <br />PROCEDURES <br />Netwo.r,k D,e_s_c_ript_io_n <br />/ The Service developed a river network which included the Green River <br />from Flaming Gorge Dam down to the confluence of the Green River and <br />`..the Colorado River including all mainstem tributaries. These <br />~~~-'1 tributaries include the Yampa River from the U.S. Geological Survey <br />~A~ ~, (USGS) gage near Maybell, Colorado to the confluence of the Green <br />` and Yampa Rivers; the little Snake River from the USGS gage near <br />Lily, Colorado to the confluence of the Yampa and Little Snake <br />', Rivers; the Duschesne River from the USGS gage near Randlett, Utah <br />'', to the confluence of the Duschesne and Green Rivers; the White River <br />,'from the USGS gage near Ouray, Utah to t"he confluence of the White <br />.and Green Rivers; the Price-River from the USGS gage at Woodside, <br />Utah to the Price River-Green River confluence; and the-San Rafael <br />River from the USGS gage near Green River to the San Rafael River- <br />`~Green River confluence (Figure 1). <br />The USGS gaging stations within the network were used to describe <br />discharge at all headwaters, reservoir structures, and validation <br />nodes. In addition, discharge is required at branch and junction <br />nodes within the network. Because the temperature model does not <br />route flows, an ancillary program was used to distribute the gage <br />flows throughout the network. Distribution of flows was accomplished <br />using simple mass balance. A similar approach for distributing flows <br />throughout a temperature model network was completed by Guy and <br />Theurer, (1984). The final stream network contained 52 nodes on the <br />Green River and its tributaries (Table 3). <br />Data Reduction <br />Fortran-77 programs were used to convert daily hydrologic and <br />meteorologic data into biweekly averages. The season was limited <br />to March through September to focus on the Squawfish growing season. <br />Bi-weekly averages represent the mean flow or temperature condition <br />for each two-week period. If missing data occurred, the average was <br />based on the available data. If no data were available for the <br />time period, the time period was left blank. The regression model <br />