My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7071
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7071
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:55 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 12:33:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7071
Author
Bosley, C.
Title
Pre-Impoundment Study of the Flaming Gorge Reservoir.
USFW Year
1960.
USFW - Doc Type
Cheyenne.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
-b~- <br />A number of tributaries enter the Green River throughout the study area. <br />These tributaries were investigated during the study in an attempt to evaluate <br />them as potential spawning streams and for possible establishment of sport <br />fish populations. Of the tributaries investigated, Fontenelle Creek in the <br />upper section of the study area, must be eliminated from any consideration <br />given the Flaming Gorge Reservoir. The mouth of Fontenelle Creek lies above <br />the proposed Fontenelle .Dam, The Big Sandy River offers nothing from the stand- <br />point of a spawning tribbtary. The bottom of this stream is composed of very <br />fine sand and silt and excessive silt conditions exist during the majority <br />of the year. These conditions also render the lower section of the Big Sandy <br />River unfavorable for game fish populations. Bitter Creek flow is maintained <br />the greater part of the year by outfall from the Rock Springs Sewage IDisposal <br />Plant, Consequently, it can be considered for all practical purposes as a <br />sterile stream. Sage and Currant Creeks contain poor bottom conditions for <br />spawning purposes, Production of food in the lower sections of these streams <br />is also very light. It is doubtful that game fish populations in the reservoir <br />will utilize these streams to any extent. Henryas Fork, located approximately <br />one-fourth of a mile below the Government Bridge on the Green River, has a <br />sand and silt bottom extending some three miles upstream from the mouth. The <br />high water level of the reservoir will extend approximately five miles up <br />Henry"s Fork, thus inundating this sandy area. No game species are found in <br />the lower section of Henry®s Fork at the present time, but bottom conditions <br />of gravel and sand in the vicinity of McKinnon could furnish limited spawning <br />area to spawning migrants from the reservoir. Sheep Creek supports a trout <br />population at present and will probably continue to do so after the reservoir <br />is completed. The upper section of Sheep Creek contains rainbow and would <br />probably furnish limited spawning area to spring run species. Water flow is <br />greatly reduced during the fall; spawning area available would be very limited <br />during this period, Carter Creek supports trout populations to its mouth. <br />Recovery of rainbow x native crosses in 1959 indicate that natural reprod~~ction <br />is taking place in the stream. This stream offers the greatest potential of <br />stream tributary to the Green River for natural spawning grounds or develop- <br />ment of egg taking operations. <br />PAST STOCKING <br />The Green River from LaBarge to the town of Green River has been known <br />to contain a limited trout population for some time. However, fishing pressure <br />in this section in past years has never demanded that an intensive management <br />program be developed to improve the quality of fishing. Consequently, past <br />hatchery production and other management methods have been diverted for the <br />most part to more heavily utilized areas in the drainage. <br />The first record of stocking in the study area was November 3, 1939. <br />Since that time, approximately twenty years, there has been 223,449 fish <br />planted. At first glance, this would appear to be a substantial number9 <br />however, in analysing the calculations, it can be seen that the stocking policy <br />has not been very intensive in the section of river within the confines of <br />this study. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.