Laserfiche WebLink
Fish captured were recorded by species, measured to the nearest <br />millimeter and weighed to the nearest 10 grams. All trout were <br />measured and weighed; numbers of rough fish processed varied and was <br />dependent upon their abundance in each net. <br />RESULTS <br />Rainbow trout were the most frequent fish netted to 1965 (Tables <br />1, 2, 3). After that time production began to favor non-game fishes, <br />most notably flannel-mouth sucker, Utah chub, and since 1972, white <br />sucker. Utah chubs comprised nearly 50 percent of the total catch <br />from about 1967. White suckers seem to be increasing in abundance <br />with each year. <br />Fish population trends were relatively the same in all areas with <br />differences reflected in rates of decline (slopes of regression lines) <br />for each of the most common fish species (Figures 2, 3, 4). The rate <br />of decline in rainbow populations is virtually the same in each area <br />(-0.15 canyon and inflow, -0.16 open area). Utah chubs have been <br />increasing in abundance most rapidly in the open and inflow areas <br />while white suckers have increased most rapidly in the canyon. <br />There have been other species taken in the nets (cutthroat trout, <br />whitefish, roundtail chub, carp, mountain suckers) but they have been <br />taken only incidentally compared to rainbow trout. Utah chub, <br />flannelmouth and white sucker rates of return (indicated by net <br />catch) have been similar since early (1963 - 1965) in the project <br />(Tables 1, 2, 3). <br />DISCUSSION <br />Holcik and Pivnicka (1972) discussing changes in the ichthyomass in <br />a European reservoir (Klicava) related that the production of the im- <br />poundment over 14 years gradually changed to favor small forage <br />fishes. With these changes the fish population dropped below carrying <br />capacity of the reservoir. We have observed changes (indicated by <br />netting) in fish populations in Flaming Gorge through 14 years, but <br />cannot relate them to carrying capacity because it remains unknown. <br />Gillnet data for the reservoir show declining trout populations in all <br />areas and increasing numbers of Utah chubs (relatively small fish) and <br />white suckers. The rise of both species has been nearly meteoric. <br />Catch rates in nets doubled or tripled in a single year's time (Tables <br />2, 3 ). <br />20