Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Upper Missouri Mainstem Subbasin <br /> <br />Index (See Fig. 1) <br /> <br />1) Surface Coal Mines <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />2) Coal-Fired Electric <br />Plants <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />3) Coal Gasification <br /> <br />Q <br /> <br />Yellowstone River Subbasin <br /> <br />1) Sur face Coa 1 Mines <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />2) Coal-Fired <br />Electric Plants <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />3) Slurry Pipelines ~ <br /> <br />4) Coal Gasification <br />C <br /> <br />5) Surface Uranium <br />Mines <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Western Dakotas Subbasin <br /> <br />1) Sur face Coa I Mines <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />2) Coal-Fired Electric <br />Plants <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />3) Coal Gasification <br /> <br />Q <br /> <br />TABLE IV <br /> <br />LOCATION AND CAPACITY OF PROPOSED ENERGY PROJECTS <br />IN THE UPPER MISSOURI RIVER BASIN <br /> <br />Proiected Capacity <br /> <br />Index (See Fig. 1) <br /> <br />NA <br /> <br />Platte-Niobrara Subbasin <br /> <br />5 x 106 tpy <br /> <br />1) Surface Coal Mines <br /> <br />3 x 300 MW <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />100,000 bpd syncrude; <br />250 x 106 cfd gas <br /> <br />2) Underground Coal <br />Mines <br /> <br />Ammonia - 1,000 tpd; methanol <br /> <br />3) Coal-Fired Electric <br />Plants <br /> <br />15 x 106 tpy <br />19.1 x 106 tpy <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />NA <br /> <br />NA <br /> <br />10 x 106 cpy <br /> <br /> <br />3L5 x 106 tpy <br /> <br /> <br />3 x 106 tpy <br /> <br />4) Coal-Gasification <br /> <br />Q <br /> <br />5) Surface Uranium <br />Mines <br /> <br />2 x 700 MW (expansion) <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />500 MW <br /> <br />2 x 330 MW <br /> <br />6) Uranium Mi lIs <br /> <br />To Houston, Texas, 20-40 x 106 tpy <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />4 x 250 x 106 cfd <br />250 x 106 cfd <br /> <br />7) Oil Refinery <br />fi3 <br /> <br />100 tpd <br />1 x 106 tpy <br /> <br />11 x 106 tpy <br /> <br /> <br />11.5 x 106 tpy <br /> <br /> <br />21 x 106 tpy <br /> <br /> <br />4.4 x 106 tpy <br /> <br /> <br />14 x 106 tpy <br /> <br />NA <br />150 x 106 tpy (14 mines) <br /> <br />5 x 450 HW (2 plants) <br /> <br />2 x 450 MW <br /> <br />NA <br /> <br />250 x 106 cfd <br />2 x 125 x 106 cfd <br /> <br />Projected Capacity <br /> <br />14.5 x 106 tpy (4 mines) <br /> <br /> <br />3.6 x 106 tpy (expansion) <br /> <br /> <br />2 x 106 tpy <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />5 x 106 tpy (3 mines) <br /> <br />3x500MW <br /> <br />2x600MW <br /> <br />2x500MW <br /> <br />225 MW <br /> <br />270 x 106 cfd <br /> <br />5,000 tpd (5 mines) <br /> <br />NA (4 mines) <br /> <br />1,500 tpd <br /> <br />1,000 tpd <br /> <br />800 tpd <br />2 x 106 Ibs/yr <br />4,000 bbls/day <br /> <br />MW ,., megawa t t <br />t py '" tons per year <br />afy '" acre feet per year <br />tpd '" tons per day <br />bpd '" barrels per day <br />cfd = cubic feet per day <br /> <br />Source: Charles Rich "Prospects to Expand Energy Sources in the Western <br />United States - An Update of Information Circular 8719," Information Circular <br /> <br />8772, Bureau of Mines, Washington, DC, 1978. <br /> <br />15 <br />