6013 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Code o! Comment R po reply required. S-1 We appreciate your funding of studies for the humpback chub. However, we feel that three years will probably not be suf- 'ficieat time to~complete the studies. S-2 We agree that environmental statements may be required is _ certain cases; however, the Recovery Team can only recommend actions needed far the recovery effort. The agencies i~ volved must determine whether-their actions require an environmental statement. S-3 We feel that our recommendation concerning funding of~ propagation facilities for humpback chubs is fair. T-1 Questions concerning federal agency responsibility for critical habitat should be answered by Fish and Wildlife. Service. T-2 The research needs are outlined is Tasks 12 and 22. T-3 The citation has been corrected. U-1 The change has been made. II-2 We agree with your comment and have increased our recommended funding levels. If participating agencies feel that funds recommended by the Team are inadequate, they should allocate additional funds. V-1 Your suggestion has been incorporated into the-place. V-2 Your suggestion has been incorporated into the plan. V-3 The change has been made. V-4 The change has bees made. V-S Your suggestion has been incorporated into the place. 9-6 The genetic purity of the humpback chub does not need to be verified. Further exA~+{*+~+tion and description of related species and their known hybrids will enable investigators to accurately identify all life stages of humpback chub and sympatric species. Propagation of humpback chub, bonytail chub, and, roundtail chub for taxonomic (scientific) purposes is included under Objective 3 and does not need to be listed as a subobjective under Objective 4. 69