Laserfiche WebLink
233. Evaluate the success o! possible reintroduction programs. <br />The success of raintroduction.programs must be evaluated <br />to detexmina if they are useful for achieving desired <br />population levels. Stocked fish may be marked. Evalua- <br />tion programs can succeed if efficient sampling techniques <br />are developed and stocked fish and their progeny can be' <br />identified. , <br />24. Eliminate unfavorable activities affecting key habitats <br />responding to detrimental modifications. <br />After unfavorable land and water-use practices are identified, <br />steps should be takes to reduce or eliminate those practices. <br />The protective measures implemented will depend on the nature of <br />the .habitat disturbance and the type of habitat affected. <br />241. L lenient Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for <br />federa119 funded proiects or anY project which acts <br />habitat on federal lands. <br />The responsibilities of several federal agencies to the <br />humpback chub sad its habitat are listed in Section ~ of <br />the Endangered .Species Act of 1973. Section 7 consultations <br />will clarify the roles of each ageaey;, in some cases <br />Federal Register Publication and subsequent litigation may <br />be necessary.. Unequivocal statements of adherence to <br />Section 7 and protection of the species should be included <br />in binding decisions is landscape planning documents of <br />federal land management agencies. <br />242. Implement existing state or local laws to protect non- <br />federal lands and watez. <br />Most states have laws affording protection to the State's <br />eaviroameat; some have provisions for endangered species <br />in eater use decisions. Proper planning at the state <br />and local level can provide protection of vital habitat. <br />18 <br />