My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6012
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
6012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:55 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 12:17:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
6012
Author
Miller, W. H., D. L. Archer, H. M. Tyus and K. C. Harper.
Title
Colorado River Fishery Project
USFW Year
1982.
USFW - Doc Type
Final Report.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• ~ a <br />DISCUSSION <br />Overview <br />Over the past 2'~ years, this study has compiled a vast amount of <br />new biological information on the endangered Colorado River fishes. We <br />have determined the distribution and identified key critical areas in <br />the Upper Colorado River Basin. <br />Generally, it appears that the bonytail chub is near extinction in <br />the upper basin with only one isolated area near Coal Creek in the Green <br />River where this species can now be taken. The humpback chub has three <br />populations in the upper basin; one remnant, poorly defined population <br />in the Green River in the Coal Creek area and two rather secure populations <br />in the main Colorado River at Black Rocks and Westwa-ter near the Utah- <br />Colorado state line. The Colorado squawfish occurs throughout the upper <br />basin, but depends on a few key areas for spawning and fry rearing. Key <br />spawning areas in the Green River drainage are the lower Yampa down to <br />Split Mountain on the Green River and in Gray Canyon on the lower Green <br />River. Key spawning areas in the Colorado River are from Loma to the <br />Utah state line. Fry rearing areas are downstream from spawning areas <br />and are characterized by shallow depths with side channels and backwater <br />habitat. <br />Life history information gathered has documented the rather sed- <br />entary, isolated existence of the humpback chub populations. Conversely, <br />for the squawfish our data indicates a wide ranging species capable of <br />movements over great distances, with a homing behavior and some exten- <br />sive use of tributary streams. <br />Overall, it appears that we need <br />dangered Colorado River fishes to the <br />is probably decreasing in population, <br />of management. Whereas, the humpback <br />the isolated habitats where they now <br />rivers do not deteriorate further. <br />to key our management of the en- <br />Colorado squawfish. This species <br />but still offers the possibility <br />chub are believed to be secure in <br />reside if habitat conditions in the <br />Recommendations <br />Recommendation of river flows needed for each target species were <br />made based upon what was needed for survival of the species at the <br />present population level. Recommendations are limited to the main Green <br />and Colorado Rivers and are specific to representative reaches of the. <br />river. It should be pointed out that flows provided at upstream stations <br />of the main Green and Colorado Rivers are assumed will remain in the <br />respective rivers and provide all or a aajor portion of the flows needed <br />at down river locations. <br />Flow needs for each target fish species were based upon a sequence <br />of evaluations and determinations. The following determination or <br />evaluation was made for each target species: Z) Where were the critical <br />geographic areas in the river system, 2) What was the critical life <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.