My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6012
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
6012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:55 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 12:17:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
6012
Author
Miller, W. H., D. L. Archer, H. M. Tyus and K. C. Harper.
Title
Colorado River Fishery Project
USFW Year
1982.
USFW - Doc Type
Final Report.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The progression from egg. to yearling is another segment of this <br />fish's life history that is very finely balanced between adequate re- <br />cruitment to maintain a viable population and slow decline to extinction. <br />Indications are that larvae drift, probably passively for a time, downstream <br />into more moderate reaches which offer sanctuaries in the form of backwaters. <br />This drift appears to be up to 100 mi distant. These larvae and fry <br />have exhibited such a strong attraction to backwaters that one can only <br />conclude that backwaters are very critical to these fish's survival. <br />Observations suggest that those backwaters that are more permanent <br />throughout the hydraulic cycle and are least impacted by high and low <br />flows are the most attractive to young squawfish. Those that are <br />dewatered or flushed at high or low flows generally supported fewer <br />young squawfish. There is a danger in conducting off-channel gravel <br />pits or other constricted quite-water areas with backwaters. These were <br />not the beneficial habitats one might conclude upon cursory examination <br />because of the extensive exotic, particularly Centrarchid, populations <br />they harbored. They, therefore, presented a very alien ecological <br />environment to the younger squawfish and, in fact, may have negatively <br />impacted main-channel populations by providing a source of recruitment <br />of those exotic species to the river. <br />During late summer through the fall months, YOY squawfish preferred <br />backwater areas of zero velocity, less than 1.5 ft in depth over a silt <br />substrate. Where these habitats were prevelent, substantial numbers of <br />YOY squawfish were collected. Where they were lacking, few YOY were <br />found. Similar selective behavior was observed during the early spring, <br />prior to runoff. During and after heavy runoff few young fish were <br />captured in significant numbers. It is not known whether their behavior <br />changed drastically 'in preference for other, less effectively sampled <br />habitats or if these fish experienced very high mortalities during <br />runoff. <br />Juvenile squawfish (60mm-400mm TL) exhibited habitat preferences <br />similar to the YOY fish but appeared to be more mobil and adaptable to <br />conditions away from the very sheltered environment provided by backwaters. <br />Collection Ad~e,.,~n~trated a preference for negligible velocity and silty ~ <br />substrates,~~'~iut"the range of conditions where juveniles were caught <br />extended into the higher velocities and courser substrates than for YOY. <br />They clearly exhibited a preference for greater depths, averaging betweea <br />1.2 to 3.3 ft. Depth preferences were higher for the Colorado than the <br />Green. This probably reflected a greater availability of deeper waters <br />in the Colorado rather than a difference between populations. We interpret <br />juvenile habitat preference as representing an intermediate phase in the <br />shift from the backwater requirements of YOY to the deeper main-channel <br />eddy and shoreline habitats preferred by the adult squawfish. <br />Adult squawfish sought out habitats of moderate depths, between 3 <br />and 6 ft, with velocities of less than 1.0 ft/sec. During the runoff <br />period they appeared to select areas away from the main channel that <br />provided velocities below those observed during other times of the year. <br />Generally, squawfish larger than 400 mm preferred habitats adjacent to <br />the main river channel that offered some depth, but not necessarily the <br />greatest depths available in the area, and some protection from higher <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.