My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6002
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
6002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:54 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 12:15:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
6002
Author
Martinez, P. J.
Title
White River Taylor Draw Project Pre-and Postimpoundment Fish Community Investigations
USFW Year
1986.
USFW - Doc Type
Final Report.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
,~Y <br />and the CO/UT stateline (RK llb.5, RM 71.8). Typically, <br />the .river in the study area is a coolwater/warmwater <br />system that is subject to extremes in discharge and <br />frequently carries a heavy silt load. Peak discharges <br />during this study exceeded those recorded since 1970. <br />High flows approached but barely exceeded 4000 cfs until <br />1983 when discharge exceeded 6000 cfs. <br />Taylor Draw Dam. which is scheduled to release <br />run-of-the-river and maintain Kenney Reservoir full the <br />ma,iority of the time, did not appear to influence <br />discharge except during the filling period from October to <br />December, 1984. Due to its low retention time. Kenney <br />Reservoir should have minimal influence on seasonal flow <br />or thermal regimes except during extremely low flow <br />years. While seasonal temperature trends were not greatly <br />affected, below the dam, diurnal thermal constancy was <br />evident during the baseflow period (September-March) and <br />the river remained ice-free in winter. Both conditions <br />appeared to persist downstream approximately 16 km (10 <br />mi.) to .just below Rangley. The most obvious physical <br />change in the river below the dam was the reduction of <br />turbidity. Much of the river's sediment is trapped at the <br />r~rowing inlet delta. but dependinst on diseharr~e, the <br />entire reservoir may become turbid. Water clarity is <br />diminished below Dourtlas Creek. 11 km (7 mi.) below the <br />dam. which carries a tremendous sediment load durinst <br />periods of high flow. <br />xiv <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.