Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. 1'- ""''''_''<'7,,,,~'A.'9;_-..._, <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br />Table 17. Photography - videography cost comparisons. <br /> <br />Cost component <br /> <br />CIR aerial photography <br /> <br />Airborne videography <br /> <br />Data acquisition $5,600 <br />Field work (2 staff weeks) 4,000 <br />Image interpretation 3,000 <br />Map preparation 2,000 <br />Digitization 2,000 <br />Computer costs 400 <br />Plotting 400 <br />Report 1,000 <br /> <br />$1,600 <br />4,000 <br />3,000 <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />1,000 <br /> <br />Totals <br /> <br />$18,400 <br /> <br />$9,600 <br /> <br />Cost for data acquisition was based on 21 rm; interpretation cost was based <br />on 6 rm. <br /> <br />The total cost for aerial photography/GIS was approximately twice that of <br />airborne videography/MIPS. The costs for image interpretation of <br />videography may be reduced significantly as image analysts become more <br />familiar with videography images and the computer software used. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />1986 Pilot Study <br /> <br />The 1986 pilot study indicated that 1:4,000 scale color infrared aerial <br />photography could be successfully used to determine backwater availability <br />on the Green River. Analysis of the two 1,889 ft3/s flows photographed at <br />different times produced some interesting observations. The Qftober Flaming <br />Gorge Dam r~l eases averaQed 2.700 ft3/ s /i tb a ~ flow of !, 240 ft3/ s ~ and <br />the Novemb~r releases !yeragpd 3,800 ft /s with a hlgh flow ~f 4.180 ft Is. <br />Apparentl flows of this ma nitude were sufficient 0 dis lace and de rade <br />s~s. These 1 w even . e ed total bac water area b t <br />~err.p-nt although total backwaters decreaseg. <br /> <br />1987 Study <br /> <br />Optimum flows for maximizing Green River backwater habitat varied among <br />sites. However, the data indicated a range of flows which produced maximal <br />backwater area and numbers under the conditions of the study. When the four <br />upper sites are considered, a range of flows from 1,101 to 1,773 ft3/s <br />produced substantially more backwater area and numbers than did 5,260 and <br />2,423 ft3/s flows. The Island Park and Jensen sites had predictably more <br />backwater area as flows were decreased, and backwater area was maximized at <br />a range of 1,101 to about 1,430 ft3/s. The large increase in backwater area <br />