Laserfiche WebLink
<br />17 <br /> <br />136-155 had an unusually high number of backwaters{mile (4.2) for the lower <br />Green River, however, the mean size was only 167 m. The remaining lower rm <br />segments ranged from only 1.0 to 2.8 backwaters/mile. <br /> <br />Table 15 summarizes backwater characteristics for each of the sampling <br />strata used by Tyus et ale (1987). Strata E and F, which represent the <br />upper nursery area for Colorado squawfish lTyus et ale 1987), contained the <br />most backwater area with 1,737 and 2,340 m/mile. Backwater number/mile was <br />greatest in stratum F (6.7) and was relatively high in stratum E (3.4/mile). <br />The average backwater size in strata E and F was 513 and 350 m2, <br />respectively. Strata A and B represent the lower Green River Colorado <br />squawfish nursery area (Tyus et ale 1987). Although backwater area and <br />number/mile for these strata were similar to those of strata C and 0, the <br />mean backwater size was significantly greater (308 and 348 ml) than for <br />strata C an 0 (155 and 195 m2, respectively). <br /> <br />Table 16 shows the comparison of Green River backwater characteristics for <br />Island Park, Jensen, Ouray, and Sand Wash. Flows at Mineral Bottom were not <br />comparable between 1987 and 1988. The Island Park remained relatively <br />stable between the two years, with 52 and 46 backwaters in 1987 and 1988, <br />respectively. Total backwater area was also stable, decreasing slightly <br />from 22,153 ml in 1987 to 20,866 m2 in 1988. While backwater numbers at <br />Jensen remained stable from 1987 to 1988 with 54 and 56, respectively, <br />backwater area decreased significantly from 19,039 m2 in 1987 to only <br />12,579 m2 in 1988. This was reflected in the average backwater size which <br />decreased from 353 m2 in 1987 to only 225 m2 in 1988. <br /> <br />The Ouray site changed most dramatically. Total backwaters decreased from <br />57 in 1987 to 48 in 1988. Total backwater area decreased by more than <br />60 percent from 41,177 in 1987 to only 15,108 ml in 1988, respectively. The <br />average backwater size decreased substantially from 722 m2 in 1987 to only <br />315 m in 1988. <br /> <br />Backwater habitat at Sand Wash was somewhat more stable than at Ouray. <br />Total backwaters remained constant at 11 for both years while backwater area <br />increased by approximately 41% from 9,270 ml in 1987 to 13,112 ml in 1988. <br />Average backwater size, which was largest at Sand Wash for both years, <br />increased from 843 m2 in 1987 to 1,192 m2 in 1988. <br /> <br />The flow at Mineral Bottom in 1988 was much lower than any flow photographed <br />during 1987, making comparisons between the two years difficult. A total of <br />12 backwaters were recorded with an area of 1,026 m2 during the 1988 study. <br />These numbers were somewhat less than for any flow photographed during 1987. <br />The average backwater size, which was smallest at Mineral Bottom for both <br />years, was only 86 ml in 1988. <br /> <br />Videography Results <br /> <br />Results of comparisons indicated that airborne videography equates favorably <br />with aerial photography with respect to backwater area. The August 23, <br />1988, 1:6,000 scale CIR aerial photography resulted in a total backwater <br />