Laserfiche WebLink
<br />basic goal ought to be to require conservation of water by <br />existing users so that we can rationally plan for future uses <br />and, where feasible, avoid expensive, environmentally-destructive <br />water projects. To implement that broad objective, Colorado <br />ought to give serious consideration to the following proposals. <br />These suggestions are radical in the current climate that per- <br />vades Colorado water -- a climate dominated by the lords of <br />yesterday and their powerful proponents -- but these kinds of <br />changes will certainly come. They are consistent with policies <br />that we follow in regard to all resources other than water and <br />they will be demanded by the increasing press of people and ever <br />scarcer resources. My proposals are a mixture of market-based <br />devices and principles of modern resource management. <br />First, Colorado ought to view all water policy -- to plan it <br />-- in a coordinated way, comprehensively, by watershed. The <br />state has made a good beginning in two respects. It has devel- <br />oped water courts with jurisdiction by watershed. Watersheds are <br />the logical planning units in the West. Colorado also adjudi- <br />cates the appropriation of surface and groundwater conjunctively, <br />and has the most advanced system in the country in that regard. <br />But the lords of yesterday still have a hammerlock on policy: <br />appropriative water rights are isolated out, elevated in impor- <br />tance, granted within an essentially closed system, and enforced <br />rigorously according to seniority and decreed amount. Colorado <br />water has been parceled out with virtually no thought having been <br />given to these crucial things: water quality; fish and wildlife, <br />-13-