Laserfiche WebLink
25 <br />sampler was placed over the stream bottom at depths not exceeding 2 ft. <br />The bottom rocks were hand rubbed allowing the stream flow to carry fauna <br />into the net of the Surber sampler. A total of 3 Surber samples was <br />procured from each station and all materials collected at a given sta- <br />tion and time were placed into a 1-qt jar and preserved with formaldehyde <br />for later examination. In the laboratory the insect fauna were usually <br />sorted to order designation using characteristics and/or keys presented <br />in Usinger (1956) and Edmonson (1959). Individuals from each order of <br />insects encountered were placed in plastic vials and for all orders <br />encountered except Coleoptera and Diptera the individuals were identi- <br />fied to genus and enumerated. Several Coleoptera larval forms were <br />encountered but only two, Optioserus and Narpus were positively identi- <br />fied to genus. No attempt was made to identify other Coleoptera indi- <br />viduals and they were enumerated as such. Members of the order Diptera <br />were identified and enumerated to the four families encountered viz., <br />Tendipedidae, Simuliidae, Tipulidae and Rhagionidae. Only larval members <br />of the genus Atherix are known from the family Rhagionidae, hence the <br />use of the generic name rather than the family name. Non-insect inver- <br />tebrate fauna collected were enumerated to broad categories such as <br />snails, flatworms, clams, amphipods and annelids. <br />FISHERIES STUDIES <br />Fish Collections and Identification <br />During this study over 11,000 fish were collected by hook-and-line <br />fishing, shocking, seining, and standard 125-ft experimental gillnets. <br />The latter two methods captured most of the samples. Between 1973 and <br />1975, fish collections were emphasized in sections below the North Fork,