Laserfiche WebLink
<br />vii i <br /> <br />or activity. Fish often moved closer to the stream bottom as <br /> <br />flows increased, especially for the activity of stationary swim- <br /> <br />ming and during the summer. The average mean column velocity was <br /> <br />consistently higher than fish velocity for the activity of sta- <br /> <br />~ tionary swimming. This resulted from the fact that fish were lo- <br /> <br />cated below the water depth where mean co1 umn vel oc i ti es are <br /> <br />measured. <br /> <br />Mean velocities for the activity of random swimming <br /> <br />were lower than mean velocities for stationary swimming. <br /> <br />On five occasions, fish were observed during prearranged <br /> <br />flow changes. Stationary swimming fish often moved closer to the <br /> <br /> <br />bottom as flows increased and farther fr:om the bottom as flow de- <br /> <br />creased. <br /> <br />In some cases, juveniles were observed to move closer <br /> <br />.r to shore as flows increased. Feeding rates often increased with <br />increasing flow. <br />The low water line was the upper limit for establishment of <br />aquatic plants. Water velocities (near the bottom) and substrate <br />both appeared important in determining which species of plant was <br />4r found in an area. Plant beds on silt substrate consistently had <br />higher densities of invertebrates than the other substrate types. <br />During the pre-test period in January 1982, fish were ob- <br />served to choose microhabitat similar to that chosen in January <br />1981. They were clumped in essentially the same pools as they <br />had occupied the previous year. <br />During January 1982, juvenile cutthroat were located higher <br />in the water column than the other groups of fish. The juvenile <br />cutthroat trout were physically more isolated from the other <br />groups than they were during January 1981. <br /> <br />lUll <br />