Laserfiche WebLink
<br />iv <br /> <br />-:: <br /> <br />(>3600 cfs). Microhabitat data were collected by species, physi- <br />cal acti vity, and 1 i fe stage duri ng three time peri ods: <br />pre-test, high flow test, and post-test. <br />The study area was defined as the 18 km of river between <br />~ Flaming Gorge Dam and Red Creek. Most microhabitat data were <br />collected from the first 7 river km below the dam. An intensive <br />study site was located approximately 2.4 km below the dam. <br />Physical, invertebrate, and vegetative data were collected in the <br />intensive study site for use in the hydraulic and habitat models. <br />Rainbow and cutthroat trout were the most numerous fish <br />species in the study area. Populations for both species were <br />sustained through extensive fingerling stocking by the UDWR. <br />Bro~m trout were found in low numbers in the study area, but <br />they were common below Hed Creek. All other species of fish ob- <br />served in the study area were found in low numbers. <br /> <br />Ivlethods <br /> <br />Fish microhabitat is defined as the physical (and occasion- <br />. <br />ally chemical or biological) variables that define (and presum- <br />ably influence) the exact location occupied by a fish and which <br />change or caul d potenti all y change wi tt! small changes in the <br />fish's location. Variables which are normally constant over <br />large sections of river (such as temperature, volume of flow, <br />conductivity, dissolved oxygen, etc.) are considered macrohabitat <br />variables. Macrohabitat variables were not measured in this <br />study. <br /> <br />_""_'.~'-': ,_m:1!tI <br />