Laserfiche WebLink
<br />21 <br /> <br />n9 the summer. The only habitat where adults consistently en- <br /> <br />laged in random swimming during the summer was in the largest <br /> <br />'001 s and back eddies. Adul ts were found random swimming in many <br /> <br />!ools- and back e"ddies during winter. <br /> <br />Thus, random swimmi n9 <br /> <br />;- <br /> <br />dul ts occupied a greater mean water depth during summer than <br /> <br />ur; ng wi nter. <br /> <br />ish velocity <br /> <br />Stationary swimming. Increased flows produced increases in <br />ish velocity for all life stages during the activity of station- <br /> <br />ry swimming in winter (Table 2). Flow increases from medium to <br /> <br />igh during summer usually produced increases in fish velocity. <br /> <br />he average fish velocity for juvenile rainbow trout decreased <br /> <br />lightly from medium to high flows during summer, but the change <br /> <br />as not significant (P > 0.05). <br /> <br />Fish velocity increased only <br /> <br />lightly from low to high flows for juvenile cutthroat trout in <br /> <br />he summer. This can be explained by the fact that the juvenile <br /> <br />Jtthroat trout occupied relatively quiet areas near shore <br />., <br />hroughout the summer ,resul ti n9 from their small size. <br /> <br />Adults of both species generally were observed in higher <br /> <br />21 oci ties than juvenil es. <br /> <br />This was most obvious during the <br /> <br />Jmmer when the si ze differences between the 1 i fe stages were <br /> <br />"ea te st. <br /> <br />For all flows combined, adults of both species were <br /> <br />Jund in significantly (P < 0.05) higher velocities than juven- <br />les during the summer and during the winter for rainbow trout. <br /> <br />nere_ was no si 9nifi cant (P > U. 05) differences in vel oc i ti es <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />:tween adult and juvenile cutthroat trout during the winter. <br />