My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
The Gunnison Knot
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
The Gunnison Knot
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:41:50 PM
Creation date
8/3/2009 11:21:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8230.2D
Description
Related News Articles
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
4
Author
George Sibley
Title
The Gunnison Knot
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
, Colorado Central Magazine November 1999 Page 13 Page 5 of 10 <br />it was dry except for a few small tributaries below the dam. <br />Then in the early 1960s the Bureau began a much larger dam project on the Upper Gunnison -- the <br />Wayne K. Aspinall unit of the Colorado River Storage Project. The CRSP was a massive program for <br />the beneficial development of all the remaining water in the Upper Colorado River Basin. The Bureau <br />wanted to build four big hydropower projects in the Upper Colorado Basin, then plow the proceeds from <br />power sales back into a host of small water developments for domestic, agricultural and industrial <br />purposes throughout the Basin. Three of the big power projects were built: Glen Canyon Dam on the <br />Colorado's mainstem, Flaming Gorge Dam on the Green River -- and the three-dam Aspinall unit in the <br />canyons of the Upper Gunnison. <br />The Aspinall Unit (named for western Colorado Congressman Wayne Aspinall, architect of the CRSP <br />legislation) was begun in 1962 and finally completed in 1980: Blue Mesa Dam, Morrow Point Dam, and <br />Crystal Dam. <br />This was not a popular project in the Upper Gunnison: partly because it destroyed a world-class trout <br />fishery around which a lot of resort development had already been built; and partly because people in <br />the Upper Gunnison feared that, since the Aspinall dams would store all the remaining water from the <br />Upper Gunnison and its tributaries, there would be no water left for any kind of Upper Gunnison <br />development. <br />This led the Bureau to make some promises that were perhaps not so well written down as they might <br />have been. They promised, for one thing, to replace the lost fishing stream with improved fisheries <br />elsewhere in the Upper Gunnison -- a promise that remains largely unfulfilled. <br />And to alleviate fears about lost development opportunities, the Bureau agreed to "subordinate" its claim <br />to up to 60,000 acre-feet of the water it would store for power generation in Blue Mesa, enabling the <br />Upper Gunnison to consumptively develop that much water at any time in the future with no fear of the <br />Bureau putting a call on it. The Bureau also agreed to help the Upper Gunnison water users in the event <br />of a downstream call from the UVWUA or any other senior downstream user. <br />An "Upper Gunnison Project," consisting of half a dozen small reservoirs and a network of canals to <br />distribute the subordination and then some (around 100,000 acre-feet in total), was added to the list of <br />small projects the Bureau planned to fund and build with all its power revenues from the big "cash <br />register" dams. The Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District (UGRWCD) came into being in <br />1959 as the local agent for coordinating development of the Upper Gunnison Project and its water rights. <br />The Knot thickens. <br />Making plumbing look like a river <br />Those four dams (Taylor Dam and the three Aspinall Dams) plus the Gunnison Tunnel are the major <br />physical water development structures on the Upper Gunnison. All of the rest of the traditional water <br />development in the Upper Gunnison is much smaller in scale: primarily ditches (some several miles in <br />length) or pipes to divert water for agricultural or municipal uses, and a few small municipal or ranch <br />reservoirs. <br />But like all manmade physical structures, these dams and diversions were underlaid by less tangible but <br />probably more important legal, political, economic, and cultural structures that change through time -- <br />more strands in the Knot. Throughout the 19th century and the first half of the 20th, those societal <br />structures all reflected a kind of relentless material utilitarianism: how can we turn this or that resource <br />http://www.cozine.com/archive/cc 1999/00690133.htm 7/9/2003
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.