My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Answer to Applicant's Closing Brief: Case No. 02CW38
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
Answer to Applicant's Closing Brief: Case No. 02CW38
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:41:46 PM
Creation date
7/30/2009 12:09:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8230.2B3
Description
Pleadings
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
4
Date
1/1/3000
Author
District Court, Water Division 4
Title
Answer to Applicant's Closing Brief: Case No. 02CW38
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION 4 <br />MONTROSE COUNTY, COLORADO <br />1200 N. Grand Ave., Bin A <br />Montrose, CO 81401-3146 <br />CONCERNING THE APPLICATION FOR WATER <br />RIGHTS OF UPPER GUNNISON WATER <br />CONSERVANCY DISTRICT <br />1N GUNNISON COUNTY, COLORADO <br /> ? COURT USE ONLY ? <br />Attorneys for the State of Colorado: <br />Case No. 02CW38 <br />KEN SALAZAR, Attorney General <br />SUSAN J. SCHNEIDER, Assistant Attorney General Div. /Crtrm. <br />Attorney Reg. No. 19961 * <br />LORI J. COULTER, Assistant Attorney General <br />Attorney Reg. No. 17766* <br />1525 Sherman Street, Sth Floor <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Telephone: (303) 866-5046 & (303) 866-5072 <br />*Counsel of Record <br />ANSWER TO APPLICANT'S CLOSING BRIEF <br />The Colorado Water Conservation Board ("CWCB") and the State and Division <br />Engineers, (collectively, "the State"), through the undersigned counsel, hereby submit <br />this Answer to Applicant's Closing Brief. <br />SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT <br />The long-standing diversion requirement set forth in Colorado's constitution created <br />inherent physical limitations on the amount of water that could be appropriated by one <br />entity, thus ensuring "maximum utilization" of Colorado's scarce and most valuable <br />resource. With no diversion requirement, Colorado would have been a riparian state and <br />claims for water would have no such physical limitations. Thus, throughout the State's
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.