Opening Brief - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

S rin s, 489 P.2d 324, 325-26 (Colo. 1971) (to overcome a presumption of validity, invalidity must be established beyond a reasonable doubt); Sundance Ass'n v. Arapahoe County, 534 P.2d 1212, 1217 (Colo. 1975) (burden is "beyond a reasonable doubt" to overcome presumptively valid rezoning decisions); Lomax v. Cronin, 575 P.2d 1285, 1286 (Colo. 1978) (must overcome "presumption of validity" afforded by Governor's warrant by "clear and convincing evidence"); Augustin v. Barnes, 626 P.2d 625, 628 (Colo. 1981). All reasonable doubts as to the correctness of the CWCB determinations must be resolved in favor of the agency. Bird, 489 P.2d at 325-26. A party challenging a presumptively valid finding bears the burden of overcoming that presumption, and courts "indulge every intendment in favor of its validity." Snyder Family Trust v. Adams County Bd. of Ecualization, 835 P.2d 579, 581 (Colo. App. 1992); Arapahoe Partnership v. Board of County Commissioners, 813 P.2d 766 (Colo. 1990). If the language of section 37-92-305(13) putting the burden on the Applicant is not clear, the intent of the Legislature is. During the hearings on SB 216 wherein the Board's role was discussed, Senator Perlmutter explained that a"rebuttable presumption is stronger than an advisory suggestion" by the CWCB. (Exhibit L, Sen. Perlmutter, p. 3). The CWCB determinations would be "taken by the courts as true and accurate and appropriate, somebody then comes in, has the burden, the burden then is on anybody else to try to overturn what the CWCB has said." Id. "So you made it harder, so it is not advisory, you made it harder for the objectors to complain about the CWCB suggestions or decisions." Id. "This is not an advisory kind of report given by the CWCB, but it is, it has a lot of evidentiary weight that the court will take as true and accurate unless even greater evidence comes by the other folks." Id. 20